Skip to main content

Security report for upsearch.cz

PragueBest s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PragueBest s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based digital agency specializing in custom web and e-commerce development, serving a broad range of B2B clients. Established in 2002, the company has a solid market position supported by numerous client references and industry awards. Their services include detailed data analysis, web design focused on user experience, and e-shop development with ERP integrations. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript and PHP technologies, integrates Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for security and analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust but does not detract from the professional presentation and operational maturity of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upsearch.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention upsearch.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for upsearch.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PragueBest operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, targeting businesses seeking tailored digital solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing client relationships, multi-award-winning projects, and ability to integrate complex ERP systems into e-commerce platforms. The company’s business model is project-based B2B services, with a focus on quality and customization. Their client portfolio includes notable brands and organizations, indicating strong market penetration and trust. Growth indicators include a growing team size and continuous acquisition of new talents. Partnerships with ERP providers and integration with multiple external services enhance their ecosystem. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining high service quality and expanding digital transformation capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user control, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and formal incident response documentation to enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the security measures in place are appropriate for the business type and website functionality.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user agreements.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PragueBest s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ25770438
Registration number
25770438
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PragueBest s.r.o.
Description
Digitální agentura specializující se na tvorbu webových stránek a e-shopů na míru, poskytující služby jako analýzy, návrhy webů a vývoj e-shopů s napojením na ERP systémy.
Key services
Analýzy, Tvorba webových stránek, Vývoj e-shopů, Integrace ERP systémů
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, PHP, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Strong presence of client references and awards indicating market credibility.
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR.
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including PHP and JavaScript, with integrations of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google reCAPTCHA v3. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and professional digital presence with opportunities for further optimization and modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upsearch.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upsearch.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.