Skip to main content

Security report for upo.es

Universidad Pablo de Olavide · Education · Spain

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Universidad Pablo de Olavide is a well-established public university based in Sevilla, Spain, offering a wide range of undergraduate and postgraduate programs, research facilities, and internationalization services. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for students, faculty, and institutional partners, providing access to academic information, administrative services, and virtual campus resources. The university maintains a strong market position within the Spanish higher education sector, supported by official certifications such as HRS4R and partnerships with regional and international organizations. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various multimedia plugins, hosted likely on an OpenCms platform. The site is mobile-optimized and features good SEO practices, although performance is moderate. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure login mechanisms supporting digital certificates; however, the absence of security headers and visible cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in compliance and defense-in-depth. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. The lack of WHOIS data due to registrar restrictions does not detract from the legitimacy of the site, which is corroborated by consistent branding, official domain usage, and external references. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent banners, and improving transparency around security and privacy policies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upo.es

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The university operates as a public educational institution focused on delivering higher education and research services. Its business model centers on academic program offerings, research projects, and international collaborations. The target audience includes current and prospective students, academic staff, administrative personnel, and external institutional partners. The university benefits from strong regional ties and recognized certifications, positioning it as a reputable entity in the education sector. Its digital presence supports its mission through comprehensive online services and communication channels, including social media and electronic administration portals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure login forms that support digital certificate authentication, indicating a focus on protecting user credentials and data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall defense against common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed but could be improved with visible cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy notices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Universidad Pablo de Olavide
Description
Universidad Pablo de Olavide de Sevilla. Estudios de Grado y Postgrado. Centros y Departamentos. Oferta científica y tecnológica.
Key services
Undergraduate and postgraduate education, Research and technology transfer, Internationalization programs, Virtual campus and electronic services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Slippry slider, jPlayer
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login forms with digital certificate support
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, 1millionbot chatbot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a public university portal with comprehensive academic and administrative information.
  2. Content is in Spanish and targeted at students, faculty, and institutional partners.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query restrictions by Red.es.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies with responsive design.
  5. No visible cookie consent banner despite GDPR relevance.
  6. Login forms support digital certificate authentication.
  7. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with official university channels.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published on main site.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery-based plugins for interactive elements such as sliders and media players. Google Fonts and external JavaScript libraries are loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. The site appears to be built on OpenCms or a similar CMS platform, indicated by URL patterns and content structure. While the site is mobile-friendly and SEO-optimized with proper meta tags, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching strategies. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upo.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upo.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.