Skip to main content

Security report for upmind.app

Upmind · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Upmind is a technology company focused on providing developer documentation and resources, likely through a SaaS platform or API documentation hosting service. The website analyzed is a documentation subdomain hosted on ReadMe.io, which serves as a platform for technical documentation. The specific page requested is not found (404 error), limiting content availability for analysis. The site uses modern web technologies including React and integrates multiple analytics and customer engagement tools such as Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, FullStory, and Intercom. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks security headers and privacy policies on the analyzed page. No contact or business information is present on this page, reducing business credibility and privacy compliance scores. Overall, the site appears to be a legitimate technical documentation resource but the analyzed page is an error page, limiting full assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upmind.app

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Upmind targets developers and technical users by providing documentation and developer guides. The business model appears to be SaaS or platform-based, focusing on API or software documentation hosting. The company maintains a presence on GitHub, indicating active development or open source engagement. The market position is niche within the technology documentation sector. The lack of detailed business or contact information on this page limits deeper business intelligence insights. The use of ReadMe.io as a CMS suggests reliance on third-party platforms for documentation delivery. Analytics and marketing tools indicate an interest in user engagement and product usage insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring secure transport of data. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-XSS-Protection were detected, which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The page analyzed is a 404 error page with minimal content, so no forms or inputs are present to assess for secure handling. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response and security contact information are not provided. The presence of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Ensure all documentation pages are valid and avoid broken or 404 error pages to improve user experience and trust.
  5. Review third-party analytics and tracking tools for privacy compliance and minimize data collection where possible.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. The page is a 404 Page Not Found error indicating the requested documentation page does not exist. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Upmind
Description
Upmind appears to be a technology company providing documentation and developer resources, likely related to API or software services.
Key services
Documentation hosting, Developer guides, API references
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, ReadMe.io platform, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
React
Platforms
ReadMe.io
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Amplitude, FullStory, Wootric
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Amplitude, FullStory, Wootric
Marketing tools
Intercom, Amplitude, FullStory, Wootric
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. The requested URL is a 404 Page Not Found error page.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  3. No contact information or forms present on this page.
  4. Website uses ReadMe.io platform for documentation hosting.
  5. Multiple external scripts for analytics and customer engagement are loaded.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. HTTPS is used indicating secure transport.
  8. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is normal.
  9. Content is minimal and only shows a 404 error message with branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based front-end hosted on the ReadMe.io platform, which provides a CMS tailored for developer documentation. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and stylesheets asynchronously to optimize performance. Analytics and customer engagement tools such as Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, FullStory, Intercom, and Wootric are integrated, indicating a mature approach to user behavior tracking and feedback. The page analyzed is a 404 error page, which limits content and SEO effectiveness. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. No CMS other than ReadMe.io is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Performance is moderate given the number of external scripts loaded. Technical debt appears low but the presence of a 404 page indicates some content management issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upmind.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upmind.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.