Skip to main content

Security report for upce.cz

Univerzita Pardubice · Education · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Univerzita Pardubice is a well-established Czech university providing diverse educational programs and research opportunities across multiple faculties. The website serves students, staff, researchers, and the public with comprehensive information, services, and event announcements. The institution maintains a strong digital presence with official social media channels and a professional web platform built on Drupal 10. The site demonstrates good technical maturity with modern libraries and analytics integration, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature approach to data protection. Overall, the domain and website present a trustworthy and credible digital asset for the university.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upce.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention upce.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,058
Employees
116
Customers
809
Third parties
1,133
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-06-07 · 33 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for upce.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –stag-ws.upce.cz2026-06-07
  • –adfs.upce.cz2026-06-02
  • –adfs.upce.cz2026-05-27
  • –rezervace-sport.upce.cz2026-05-25
  • –adfs.upce.cz2026-05-21

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The University of Pardubice holds a significant position in the Czech education sector, offering a broad spectrum of faculties and services. Its business model focuses on public higher education and research, targeting students, academic professionals, and the wider community. The university leverages partnerships within its faculties and maintains a strong brand identity. The website supports recruitment, student services, and public engagement, indicating a well-rounded operational approach. The presence of certifications like the HR Award further enhances its credibility. The digital ecosystem includes multiple subdomains for faculties and services, reflecting organizational complexity and outreach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a presumably strong SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate compliance with data protection regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not detected, representing an area for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Univerzita Pardubice
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Univerzita Pardubice
Description
Univerzita Pardubice is a Czech university offering a wide range of faculties and study programs, serving students and staff with educational, research, and community services.
Key services
Higher education, Research and development, Student services, Cultural and public events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, GSAP, Font Awesome, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-structured, professionally designed university site
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to students, staff, and public
  3. Multiple faculties and services linked with clear navigation
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable but no negative indicators found
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. Social media presence is consistent and official
  9. Security headers not explicitly detected, room for improvement
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and GSAP for enhanced interactivity. It integrates Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, reflecting a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance appears moderate, with multiple image sizes and deferred script loading. The use of standard web fonts and CSS modules indicates adherence to modern web development practices. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the domain uses HTTPS with a valid certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly experience with room for security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upce.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upce.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.