Skip to main content

Security report for unitracesoft.com

UNITRACESOFT · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UNITRACESOFT is a small Australian engineering company specializing in software and electronic solutions for industrial, commercial, and financial sectors. Their offerings include process automation, quality assurance, custom software development, and website design. The company targets businesses seeking affordable and flexible automation solutions, leveraging modules like u-BOX10 and NEXUS10 for process automation. The website content is informative and business-focused, though the design is basic and somewhat dated. Technically, the website uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics for tracking. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is moderately performant but lacks advanced mobile optimization and accessibility features. No forms or complex interactive elements are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating low privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, while the business appears legitimate and provides clear contact information, the lack of domain WHOIS data and security best practices lowers trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance credibility and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unitracesoft.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UNITRACESOFT operates in a niche market providing automation and software solutions primarily to industrial and commercial clients in Australia. Their competitive advantage lies in customizable automation modules and integrated software solutions. The business model is B2B, focusing on delivering tailored solutions to improve process efficiency and quality control. The presence of related domains suggests a small network of partner or sister companies. The company shows moderate growth potential but lacks visible certifications or industry accreditations. Revenue streams likely come from software sales, custom development projects, and automation hardware deployment. The company maintains direct contact channels but lacks broader digital marketing or social media presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. Absence of HTTPS or confirmation thereof is a critical gap. No security headers or privacy policies are present, indicating limited compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The lack of forms reduces risk exposure but also limits data collection transparency. WHOIS data absence is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent improvements to protect business reputation and customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Obtain and display domain WHOIS information or ensure domain registration is valid and visible.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UNITRACESOFT
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UNITRACESOFT
Description
UNITRACESOFT is an engineering company providing software and electronic solutions to industrial, commercial, and financial markets in Australia. They offer affordable automation solutions, software development, process automation, quality assurance, and website design.
Key services
Software Solutions, Process Automation Solutions, Quality Assurance, Website Design, Custom Software Development
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and navigation
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone numbers
  4. No forms present on the website to collect user data
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is suspicious
  7. No security headers or HTTPS status visible from provided data
  8. Website design is basic and somewhat outdated
  9. No social media links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without modern frameworks or CMS detected. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site structure is simple with clear navigation but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident technical debt but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience and security. No hosting provider or SSL certificate details were found in the provided data. The absence of forms reduces complexity but also limits interactive capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unitracesoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unitracesoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.