Skip to main content

Security report for unisa.edu.au

University of South Australia · Education · Australia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The University of South Australia (UniSA) operates a comprehensive and professionally designed website targeting prospective and current students, researchers, and industry partners. The institution positions itself as a leading young university in Australia with strong graduate career outcomes and research excellence. The website offers extensive information on study options, research, community engagement, and support services, reflecting a mature and user-focused digital presence. The technical infrastructure leverages modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and New Relic Browser monitoring, hosted on reliable Australian networks (AARNET). Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain, registered under Education Services Australia Limited, consistent with the educational sector. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unisa.edu.au

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UniSA is a large public educational institution serving a broad audience including domestic and international students, researchers, and industry collaborators. Its business model centers on delivering higher education degrees, research programs, and community services. The university maintains a strong market position as a top-ranked young university with notable graduate outcomes and student satisfaction. The website's ecosystem includes partnerships with Adelaide University and dedicated international student portals, indicating a collaborative and expansive operational model. Revenue streams likely include tuition fees, research grants, and partnerships. The digital presence supports strategic growth through clear navigation, comprehensive content, and engagement tools such as enquiry and application portals.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern analytics and monitoring tools suggests active performance and security monitoring. Recommendations include publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and implementing additional security headers to enhance protection against common web threats.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
University of South Australia
Description
UniSA is South Australia's no 1. university for graduate careers. Study, explore our research or partner with us.
Key services
Higher education degrees, Research programs, Industry partnerships, Community clinics, Scholarships
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery, Flickity carousel, Handlebars.js, CoreJS Typeahead, New Relic Browser monitoring
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
The Trade Desk (adsrvr.org)
Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA, New Relic Browser
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls
  3. Multiple contact points for different user groups (students, international, alumni)
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with privacy considerations
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available
  6. WHOIS data consistent with educational institution domain
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and New Relic Browser for performance monitoring. It employs popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flickity for carousels, and Handlebars.js for templating. Hosting is via Australian academic networks (AARNET), ensuring reliable connectivity. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Opportunities exist to enhance technical SEO and security header implementation to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unisa.edu.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unisa.edu.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.