Skip to main content

Security report for uni-freiburg.de

Universität Freiburg · Education · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Universität Freiburg is a prestigious and long-established university in Germany, known for its comprehensive education and research offerings across eleven faculties and approximately 240 study programs. It serves a large community of over 24,500 students and 8,300 employees, emphasizing interdisciplinary research, teaching, and knowledge transfer. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Matomo analytics configured to respect user privacy by disabling cookies. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, providing a good user experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and privacy-conscious analytics, though explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page are absent. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response information suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is strong, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and alignment with the university's reputable brand. Strategic enhancements in security policy disclosure and incident response communication would further strengthen its security maturity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of uni-freiburg.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uni-freiburg.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
3
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Universität Freiburg holds a strong market position as a leading European research university with a broad academic portfolio. Its business model centers on public education and research, targeting students, researchers, and academic partners. The university benefits from a well-established brand, extensive academic offerings, and active engagement in technology, knowledge, and education transfer. Its partnership ecosystem includes recognized social media channels and collaborations within European university networks. Growth indicators include ongoing research funding and strategic focus areas such as sustainability and diversity. The website content and structure support its mission and outreach effectively.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and privacy-respecting analytics. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected in the HTML content. Security best practices such as disabling cookies in Matomo are implemented. However, the site lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for transparency and user trust. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security policy communication and technical header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add clear incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Universität Freiburg
Description
Die Universität Freiburg ist eine der forschungsstärksten Universitäten Europas mit einem breiten Fächerspektrum, elf Fakultäten, etwa 240 Studiengängen und einem interdisziplinären Angebot. Sie ist lokal verwurzelt, europäisch und global vernetzt, mit einem starken Fokus auf Forschung, Lehre, Transfer, Nachhaltigkeit, Gleichstellung, Vielfalt und Inklusion.
Key services
Studium, Forschung, Lehre, Technologie-, Wissen- und Bildungstransfer
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Tailwind CSS, Matomo Analytics, SVG graphics, HTML5, JavaScript
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Matomo configured to disable cookies
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained university site
  2. Content is in German with English alternate available
  3. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  4. Strong focus on education, research, and transfer
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence
  6. Use of Matomo analytics with privacy considerations
  7. Multiple official social media channels linked
  8. No explicit security or incident response policy found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a custom theme utilizing Tailwind CSS for styling and Matomo for analytics. The use of SVG graphics and modern JavaScript enhances visual quality and interactivity. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and hreflang attributes. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and implement advanced privacy consent mechanisms. The technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly academic website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uni-freiburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uni-freiburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.