Skip to main content

Security report for uni-bremen.de

Universität Bremen · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Universität Bremen website represents a medium-sized German university with a strong academic and research focus. It offers a wide range of Bachelor and Master programs, supports international students, and engages in various research collaborations. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides comprehensive information tailored to students, researchers, and partners. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, uses Matomo for analytics, and is hosted likely within academic networks, ensuring reliable performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, complemented by a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, some areas such as explicit incident response contacts and a vulnerability disclosure policy could be improved to enhance trust and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of uni-bremen.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uni-bremen.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uni-bremen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7,263
Employees
126
Customers
5,507
Third parties
1,630
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-06-02 · 191 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uni-bremen.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –seafile.zfn.uni-bremen.de2026-06-02
  • –seafile.zfn.uni-bremen.de2026-05-31
  • –coding.informatik.uni-bremen.de2026-05-31
  • –seafile.zfn.uni-bremen.de2026-05-28
  • –mailman.zfn.uni-bremen.de2026-05-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Universität Bremen holds a reputable position as an Exzellenzuniversität in Germany, targeting students, researchers, and academic partners. Its business model revolves around public education and research services, with key revenue streams likely from government funding and research grants. The university maintains partnerships with research centers and international programs, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear navigation and comprehensive content supporting its academic mission and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of multiple security headers, and a robust cookie consent framework. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a public security.txt file and incident response contact information indicates room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency. The use of Matomo analytics aligns with privacy-conscious data collection practices, supporting GDPR compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  2. Add explicit incident response and abuse contact information on the website.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a terms of service page to clarify user agreements.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance visibility of data protection officer contact details to improve GDPR transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Universität Bremen
Description
Die Universität Bremen ist mit rund 20.000 Studierenden eine mittelgroße deutsche Universität. Für engagierte und talentierte Studierende bietet Bremen ein breites Fächerangebot: gut 100 Masterstudiengänge und Bachelorprogramme sowie das juristische Staatsexamen. Und mit dem Forschenden Lernen hat die Universität das Projektstudium, eine Besonderheit aus ihren Gründerzeiten, neu interpretiert. 2012 wurde Bremen mit dem Zukunftskonzept „Ambitioniert und agil“ als eine von elf Universitäten als Exzellenzuniversität ausgezeichnet.
Key services
Bachelor and Master degree programs, Research and scientific projects, International student services, Continuing education, Collaboration with industry and society
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of session cookies with appropriate lifetimes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. Strong use of TYPO3 CMS and Matomo analytics.
  5. Good accessibility and mobile optimization.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with academic institution.
  8. No direct contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content.
  9. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system widely used in academia. The integration of Matomo analytics provides privacy-respecting visitor insights. The site employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Hosting appears to be managed within academic or research networks, ensuring stable performance. While the site is moderately fast, opportunities exist to optimize asset delivery and caching strategies further. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the university's digital communication needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 +20Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 51/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uni-bremen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uni-bremen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.