Skip to main content

Security report for uni-bayreuth.de

Universität Bayreuth · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Universität Bayreuth is a well-established German university offering interdisciplinary academic programs and research opportunities. The website serves as an official digital presence, targeting prospective and current students, researchers, and academic collaborators. It emphasizes a livable campus and innovative study options. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including React and Scrivito CMS, with integration of Usercentrics for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The hosting appears to be managed via academic network name servers, indicating a reliable infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not evident in the provided data. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent, but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages were found. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uni-bayreuth.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uni-bayreuth.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,877
Employees
3
Customers
2,511
Third parties
363
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-01-13 · 119 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uni-bayreuth.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –uni-bayreuth.de2026-01-13
  • –www.bayceer.uni-bayreuth.de2025-07-20
  • –.uni-bayreuth.de2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The university operates in the education sector, providing essential academic services and research. Its market position is that of a recognized German university with a focus on interdisciplinary studies and career readiness. The business model is public education and research funding. The website supports this by offering information and resources to students and academics. The presence of Usercentrics and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature approach to user data and marketing. No direct revenue streams or commercial partnerships were identified in the content. The university maintains a consistent brand and digital presence, with social media engagement via Twitter. Growth indicators include modern web infrastructure and compliance with cookie regulations.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented via a reputable provider. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not appear to have critical security issues but would benefit from enhanced security policies and transparency. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks explicit privacy policy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and security policies including GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for data protection officer and incident response teams.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Universität Bayreuth
Description
Universität Bayreuth is a university offering innovative, interdisciplinary study programs and good career opportunities on a livable campus.
Key services
higher education, research, academic programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by data-rh attributes), Usercentrics (cookie consent), Google Tag Manager, Scrivito CMS
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional university site in German language.
  2. Uses modern technologies including React and Scrivito CMS.
  3. Implements cookie consent via Usercentrics.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the truncated HTML.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Scrivito CMS, ensuring dynamic content management and responsive design. Integration with Usercentrics and Google Tag Manager demonstrates attention to privacy and analytics. Hosting via DFN name servers suggests a stable academic network environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and expand accessibility features to meet higher standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uni-bayreuth.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uni-bayreuth.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.