Skip to main content

Security report for undato.co

Un Dato · Technology · Colombia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Un Dato is a small technology company specializing in data-driven customer experience enhancement solutions. Their offerings include pixel tracking, AI-powered audience segmentation, gamification, subscription management, and data enrichment services. The company targets businesses, particularly SMEs, seeking to leverage precise and reliable data for strategic decision-making. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and hosted on Cloudflare, employing modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers and policies are missing. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. Contact is facilitated via a web form collecting email and message text, but no direct emails or phone numbers are published. Overall, the site presents a credible business with clear product offerings and transparent pricing, though improvements in privacy and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching undato.co

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche SaaS provider in the marketing technology sector, focusing on user affinity segmentation without cookies, which is a competitive advantage in privacy-conscious markets. Their modular product suite allows clients to select from basic tracking to advanced AI analytics and gamification, supporting diverse business needs. Pricing tiers are clearly defined, supporting scalability. The absence of direct contact details may limit trust for some clients, but the presence of a contact form and privacy policy supports basic business credibility. The company appears to operate primarily in Colombia and Spanish-speaking markets, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies beyond a documentation subdomain. The business model relies on subscription revenues and value-added modules, targeting digital marketing teams and SMEs.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare for hosting and analytics, which provides a strong baseline security level. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The contact form collects minimal data and appears secure, but no anti-bot or CAPTCHA mechanisms are visible. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting external reporting channels. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Create and expose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Consider adding direct contact emails or phone numbers for sales/support to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Un Dato
Description
Somos una compañía que potencia las experiencias de los clientes mediante soluciones basadas en datos precisos y confiables, recopilados de múltiples fuentes para decisiones estratégicas efectivas. Ofrecen productos para segmentación de usuarios, análisis de afinidad, gamificación, registro y suscripción, enriquecimiento de datos y soluciones en tiempo real.
Key services
Undato Pixel, Undato IA, Undato Gamificación, Undato Registro - suscripción, Undato Enriquecido, Undato Realtime
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Google Fonts (Lato), Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Pages Analytics
Platforms
Cloudflare hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Pages Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Spanish targeting Latin American markets.
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite use of tracking.
  4. Contact form collects email and message text only, no phone or address fields.
  5. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses on the site.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Pricing plans clearly detailed with features and costs in USD.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on Cloudflare.
  9. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  10. Privacy policy present but basic and no explicit GDPR compliance statements.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript modules and asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager scripts, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. Hosting on Cloudflare ensures good global performance and security. The site is mobile responsive with clear navigation and structured content. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading placeholders visible, indicating optimization efforts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better form labeling. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with undato.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review undato.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.