Skip to main content

Security report for uncut.wtf

UNCUT.wtf · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UNCUT.wtf is a niche online platform offering a free catalogue of contemporary typefaces, currently featuring 163 fonts across categories such as Sans Serif, Serif, Monospace, and Display. The website primarily serves designers, typographers, and font enthusiasts by providing curated font information and direct download links to external sources like GitHub and personal foundry sites. The business model is centered on free distribution and cataloguing rather than direct sales, positioning UNCUT.wtf as a valuable resource in the typography community. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, and leverages Cloudflare for hosting and analytics. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and basic accessibility features. However, it lacks advanced security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data due to unsupported TLD WHOIS limits domain trust verification but is common for such domains. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or contain forms collecting personal information, reducing risk. The presence of a privacy and terms page adds to compliance, though GDPR indicators and cookie consent are minimal. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be enhanced to improve security posture. Overall, UNCUT.wtf is a professionally presented, safe, and useful resource with moderate trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency would elevate its security and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uncut.wtf

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UNCUT.wtf operates in the technology sector focusing on digital typography resources. Its competitive advantage lies in curating a diverse and contemporary font catalogue freely accessible to the design community. The business model is non-commercial, relying on linking to external font sources rather than hosting or selling fonts directly. Target customers are designers and typographers seeking free, quality fonts. Growth indicators include a broad font selection and active social media presence. Partnerships appear informal, primarily linking to open-source repositories and foundries. The operation is small scale with no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicate gaps in security best practices and privacy compliance. No dedicated security or incident response policies are visible, which limits preparedness for potential incidents. The site does not collect personal data via forms, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a content catalogue but could benefit from enhancements to align with GDPR and modern security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing GDPR adherence and data retention policies in the privacy policy.
  5. Consider providing verified contact information such as a company email to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UNCUT.wtf
Description
UNCUT.wtf is a free typeface catalogue, focusing on somewhat contemporary type. There are currently 163 typefaces featured.
Key services
typeface cataloguing, font download linking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare Insights
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • No forms collecting sensitive info

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free typeface catalogue featuring 163 fonts.
  2. Content is well structured with categories: Sans Serif, Serif, Monospace, Display.
  3. Fonts link to external sources like GitHub, Behance, and personal sites for downloads.
  4. No forms collecting personal data found on the main page.
  5. Privacy and terms page exists but cookie consent is missing.
  6. No contact email explicitly shown; email is indicated as copyable text in footer but not directly visible.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram is linked.
  8. Uses HTTPS and Cloudflare Insights for analytics.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No WHOIS registrar or domain creation/expiry info available due to unsupported TLD WHOIS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a clean, modern tech stack using HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with asynchronous loading of scripts and fonts for performance optimization. It uses Cloudflare for hosting and analytics, which contributes to fast loading times and global availability. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or complex frameworks were detected, indicating a lightweight and maintainable infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by adding security headers and cookie management. The site’s technical implementation supports a good user experience and reliable operation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uncut.wtf. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uncut.wtf.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.