Skip to main content

Security report for unblockeurope.com

UN:BLOCK · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UN:BLOCK is a prominent organizer of blockchain and crypto conferences in Northern Europe, focusing on fostering connections among investors, developers, regulators, and industry leaders. The company positions itself as a leading event platform in Riga, Latvia, with a strong emphasis on Web3, digital assets, and crypto regulation. Their business model centers on event ticket sales, sponsorships, and partnerships, targeting a specialized audience within the European crypto ecosystem. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content about their events and sponsors. Technically, the website is built on Webflow, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and incorporates cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. However, some security best practices such as DNSSEC and explicit security policies are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and resilience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The domain WHOIS data reveals a recent registration date inconsistent with the event history claimed, which may warrant further verification. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security posture but could benefit from additional transparency and technical enhancements. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and continuous monitoring of domain registration details to ensure alignment with business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unblockeurope.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UN:BLOCK operates in the niche market of blockchain and crypto event organization, targeting a European audience interested in Web3 innovation and regulation. Their competitive advantage lies in their regional leadership and strong network of sponsors and partners from both crypto-native and traditional finance sectors. Revenue streams primarily come from ticket sales and sponsorship packages. The company demonstrates growth potential through expanding attendee numbers and increasing corporate participation. Their partnership ecosystem includes ticketing platforms and marketing service providers, indicating a collaborative operational model. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining market leadership by enhancing event quality and expanding digital engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline compliance with privacy and security standards. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies represents gaps that could expose the organization to DNS spoofing, clickjacking, or other web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy and cookie policies, but incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure transparency are lacking. Enhancing these areas would improve the organization's security culture and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden web security.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a dedicated security contact channel and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UN:BLOCK
Description
UN:BLOCK is Northern Europe’s largest Web3 and crypto conference uniting founders, policymakers, and industry leaders in Riga, Latvia on April 1–2, 2026. It focuses on blockchain, crypto regulation, digital assets, DeFi, fintech, and startups.
Key services
Conference events, Networking opportunities, Sponsorship and partnership programs, Educational panels and keynotes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Spline (3D animation), jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Typeform (for forms and partner signups)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event site for a blockchain and crypto conference in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is rich with structured data, social media links, and sponsor information.
  3. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. Modern tech stack with Webflow and common analytics/tracking tools.
  7. Domain WHOIS data shows some inconsistency with event history claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, no-code platform (Webflow) with integration of popular analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. It uses CDN-hosted assets for performance and includes advanced 3D animations via Spline. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata and structured data for rich search results. Hosting appears stable and fast, with no broken elements detected. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. Opportunities exist to improve security posture and technical documentation to support long-term scalability and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unblockeurope.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unblockeurope.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.