Skip to main content

Security report for unaone.net

unaone imc services Markus Hagge · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

unaone imc services Markus Hagge is a small German technology service provider specializing in personalized web hosting, domain registration, cloud solutions, and managed services such as Nextcloud, Jitsi, and BigBlueButton. The company emphasizes data privacy by hosting exclusively in German data centers, appealing to privacy-conscious customers. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, but the overall business presentation and social media presence support credibility. Strategic improvements in security transparency and WHOIS registration clarity are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unaone.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
90
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention unaone.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for unaone.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, targeting small to medium businesses and individuals seeking reliable and privacy-focused web hosting and cloud services. Its business model centers on providing managed hosting solutions and cloud collaboration tools, leveraging partnerships with recognized software providers like Collabora. The firm maintains a regional market position with a focus on German data protection compliance. Revenue streams likely include hosting packages, domain sales, managed cloud services, and support contracts. The partnership ecosystem includes local organizations such as DiWiSH and regional branding initiatives. Growth indicators include recent blog updates and technology upgrades. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and use of privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo). However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files, which are important for transparency and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of security headers like CSP and HSTS is a gap that should be addressed. GDPR compliance is well indicated through privacy policies and cookie management. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security culture and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Clarify and ensure WHOIS domain registration information is accurate and publicly available to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
unaone imc services Markus Hagge
Description
Der persönliche Partner für Ihre Webprojekte - Webhosting, Domains, Server, E-Mail, Exchange, Cloud-Lösungen, Tools für Homeoffice
Key services
Webhosting, Domains, Dedicated and virtual servers, Managed Nextcloud, Managed Jitsi, Managed BigBlueButton, Collabora Online, SSL certificates, Support and maintenance services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 10.0.4, Elementor 3.30.3, PHP 8.4 (supported), Matomo analytics, Borlabs Cookie consent, W3 Total Cache, LazyLoad JS
Frameworks
Elementor, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics, WooCommerce
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in German and targets German-speaking customers
  3. Strong focus on privacy and GDPR compliance
  4. No security.txt or explicit security policy found
  5. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies
  7. Social media presence is consistent and professional
  8. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It employs PHP 8.4, indicating up-to-date server-side technology. Performance is moderate with caching and lazy loading implemented. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Analytics are handled by Matomo, a privacy-focused tool. The technical stack is well maintained but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance tuning. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for technical enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unaone.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unaone.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.