Skip to main content

Security report for umbrovskis.lv

Rolands Umbrovskis · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rolands Umbrovskis operates as a self-employed web developer and WordPress programmer based in Latvia, with a professional focus on PHP and digital media project management. The website presents a clear personal brand with detailed descriptions of services, technical skills, and a long history dating back to 2004. The business model is freelance and consulting-oriented, targeting clients needing web development and content marketing expertise. Technically, the site uses a modern stack including PHP, WordPress, CodeIgniter, Node.js, and Flutter, with integration of analytics tools like Google Analytics and Matomo. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the site content and contact information suggest legitimacy and professionalism. Overall, the site is well-structured and trustworthy for its niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching umbrovskis.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention umbrovskis.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for umbrovskis.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a niche freelance web developer with a strong focus on WordPress and PHP programming. The target market includes small to medium businesses or individuals seeking custom web solutions and content marketing consulting. The company leverages partnerships such as mediabox.lv for extended services. Revenue streams likely come from project-based web development and consulting engagements. The presence on GitHub and LinkedIn supports professional credibility and client acquisition. Growth indicators include ongoing skill development in Flutter and Python. The partnership ecosystem is limited but focused on complementary service providers. Strategic observations suggest a stable, experienced solo operation with potential for expansion through digital marketing and enhanced service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in best practices. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content. The use of multiple analytics services increases the importance of clear privacy disclosures. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rolands Umbrovskis
Description
Rolands Umbrovskis is a self-employed web developer, blogger, and WordPress programmer specializing in PHP. He has been active since 2004 and offers services including web development, WordPress programming, PHP programming, and digital media project management.
Key services
Web development, WordPress programming, PHP programming, Content marketing consulting, Digital media project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, WordPress, CodeIgniter, Node.js, Flutter, Python, MySQL/MariaDB, Apache, Nginx, Docker, Bootstrap 4.5.3, Font Awesome 4.3.0
Frameworks
CodeIgniter, WordPress
Platforms
Linux Ubuntu
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent across structured data and page content.
  4. Use of multiple Google Analytics IDs and Matomo for analytics.
  5. Modern tech stack with PHP, WordPress, Node.js, and Flutter mentioned.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms detected on the page; no data collection forms present.
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains related to analytics, CDN, and professional profiles.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Content is professional and targeted at web development clients.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including PHP, WordPress, CodeIgniter, Node.js, Flutter, and Python, indicating a broad technical skill set. Front-end technologies include Bootstrap 4.5.3 and Font Awesome 4.3.0. The site is hosted on a Linux Ubuntu environment with Apache or Nginx web servers. Performance is moderate with preconnect and preload optimizations for external resources. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, canonical links, and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found. The site lacks visible security headers which is a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with umbrovskis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review umbrovskis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.