Skip to main content

Is umaryland.edu a Scam? Security Check Results - The University of Maryland, Baltimore

umaryland.edu Security Report Summary

umaryland.edu received a security score of 66 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers The University of Maryland, Baltimore's website security posture. The University of Maryland, Baltimore operates in the Education industry in United States.

The University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB) is a prominent public university specializing in health, law, and human services education, research, patient care, and public service. It holds a strong market position as the state's leading institution in these sectors, serving a diverse audience including students, healthcare professionals, legal experts, and public service workers. The website reflects the institution's commitment to excellence and accessibility, featuring comprehensive content and professional branding. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, and accessibility tools, hosted on a CMS platform likely TerminalFour. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and strong accessibility compliance, ensuring a positive user experience across devices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates security best practices, though explicit security headers could be more visible. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR considerations. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to .edu domain registration norms, not detracting from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity, supporting its role as a trusted educational institution.

The security scan identified 29 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Accessibly accessibility widget, Typekit fonts, Google Fonts (Noto Sans), JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

umaryland.edu favicon

Is umaryland.edu Safe? Security Analysis for The University of Maryland, Baltimore

https://www.umaryland.edu/

Check if umaryland.edu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Stateslarge
jQuery 3.7.1Font Awesome 6 ProGoogle Tag ManagerAccessibly accessibility widgetTypekit fonts+4 more
Analyzed Completed
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Education avg (55)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for umaryland.edu

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

The University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB) is a prominent public university specializing in health, law, and human services education, research, patient care, and public service. It holds a strong market position as the state's leading institution in these sectors, serving a diverse audience including students, healthcare professionals, legal experts, and public service workers. The website reflects the institution's commitment to excellence and accessibility, featuring comprehensive content and professional branding. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, and accessibility tools, hosted on a CMS platform likely TerminalFour. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and strong accessibility compliance, ensuring a positive user experience across devices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates security best practices, though explicit security headers could be more visible. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR considerations. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to .edu domain registration norms, not detracting from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity, supporting its role as a trusted educational institution.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1Font Awesome 6 ProGoogle Tag ManagerAccessibly accessibility widgetTypekit fontsGoogle Fonts (Noto Sans)JavaScriptCSS3HTML5

8 urgent findings need attention

8 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep umaryland.edu under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for umaryland.edu.

OffSeq Observations

No critical findings yet

83/100

DNS Health

3 findings

80/100

Network Security

1 finding

100/100

Email Security

4 findings

75/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

UMB operates as a large public university with a focus on professional and graduate education in health, law, and human services. Its business model centers on education, research, and public service, supported by state funding and partnerships. The university targets students, professionals, and researchers, leveraging a strong brand and comprehensive service offerings. The website's integration with analytics and social media indicates active engagement and marketing efforts. The lack of WHOIS transparency is offset by the institution's established reputation and sector. Growth indicators include ongoing research initiatives and public service programs, positioning UMB competitively within the education sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security best practices, and integration of accessibility and privacy compliance tools. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present and should be verified. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is managed with asynchronous loading, minimizing performance impact. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, suggesting an area for improvement. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment appropriate for an educational institution handling sensitive user data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The University of Maryland, Baltimore

Description:

The University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB) is the state’s public health, law, and human services university devoted to excellence in professional and graduate education, research, patient care, and public service.

Key Services:
professional and graduate educationresearchpatient carepublic service
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1Font Awesome 6 ProGoogle Tag ManagerAccessibly accessibility widgetTypekit fontsGoogle Fonts (Noto Sans)JavaScriptCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading
  • Accessibility widget for compliance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)LinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official university website with comprehensive content and professional design

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the umaryland.edu security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete umaryland.edu security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:u826348.wl.sendgrid.net include:mh.blackboard.com ip4:134.192.28.140 ip4:23.101.136.128 ip4:134.192.28.141 ip4:13.92.177.21 ip4:52.168.9.69 ip4:52.45.50.190 ip4:52.42.20.3 ip4:54.17 4.147.233 ip4:34.213.212.147 ip4:184.73.24.220 ip4:4.156.82.98 ip4:159.112.242.99 ip4:20.120.123.199 ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:[email protected]

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Expiry Risk
none(402 days)

DNS Records

A Records:76.223.74.205, 13.248.217.174
Name Servers:
dns1.umaryland.eduDNS only
dns2.umaryland.eduDNS only
dns3.umaryland.eduDNS only
MX Records:
25: umaryland-edu.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2026060405, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:u826348.wl.sendgrid.net include:mh.blackboard.com ip4:134.192.28.140 ip4:23.101.136.128 ip4:134.192.28.141 ip4:13.92.177.21 ip4:52.168.9.69 ip4:52.45.50.190 ip4:52.42.20.3 ip4:54.17 4.147.233 ip4:34.213.212.147 ip4:184.73.24.220 ip4:4.156.82.98 ip4:159.112.242.99 ip4:20.120.123.199 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does umaryland.edu compare?

See how umaryland.edu stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern and robust technical infrastructure, utilizing jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, and accessibility widgets. It is likely managed via TerminalFour CMS, indicating enterprise-level content management capabilities. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility, with comprehensive meta tags and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and optimized assets. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for explicit security header implementation and continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies. The infrastructure supports the university's mission effectively, with opportunities for further modernization and security enhancements.
Professional Report

Download the umaryland.edu report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the umaryland.edu report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about umaryland.edu

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website