Skip to main content

Security report for uk.net

.UK.NET · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Website hygiene.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website uk.net represents .UK.NET, a domain registry service offering unrestricted .UK.NET domain registrations targeting businesses and individuals seeking a UK digital presence with global reach. The company positions itself as an independent entity unaffiliated with UK government or other registries, providing a flexible domain alternative with no residency restrictions. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides clear information about domain registration benefits, live sites, and contact avenues. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Underscore.js, Bootstrap grid, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks published security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Contact and abuse handling are managed via a trusted partner, Gen.xyz, enhancing trust. Overall, the site is credible and suitable for its business purpose, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 2 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga_7WEDK3F99Y, _ga). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Website hygiene

    Outdated scripts and CMS versions are how most small-business sites get compromised; a security.txt file tells researchers where to report what they find.

    • High

      Outdated JavaScript library with known vulnerabilities

      underscore.js 1.8.3 (detected in the page) has 2 published vulnerabilities: CVE-2021-23358, GHSA-cf4h-3jhx-xvhq, CVE-2026-27601, GHSA-qpx9-hpmf-5gmw.

      What to do: Upgrade underscore.js to 1.13.8 or later and retest the pages that use it.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uk.net

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
53
Email security
90
DNS health
98
Network security
100
Website hygiene
75
GDPR outside view
75
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uk.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7,042
Employees
28
Customers
3,508
Third parties
3,506
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-10-06 · 366 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uk.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –utsumi.uk.net2026-10-06
  • –consultant.uk.net2026-10-06
  • –oswald.uk.net2026-10-06
  • –seed.uk.net2026-10-06
  • –sgs.uk.net2026-10-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector as a domain registry and reseller for the .UK.NET TLD, targeting a niche market of UK-related domain registrations accessible globally without restrictions. Its competitive advantage lies in offering premium domain availability where traditional UK domains are saturated. The business model centers on domain sales and support services, leveraging partnerships with Gen.xyz for customer support and abuse management. The target customers include UK businesses expanding internationally, global companies entering the UK market, and startups seeking UK branding. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and trust signals through HTTPS, clear contact info, and association with known domain service providers. Growth potential exists in expanding domain registrations and enhancing service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks formal security documentation such as a security policy or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and incident response readiness. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking but no evident privacy controls like cookie consent banners. Incident response is partially addressed through abuse reporting channels managed by Gen.xyz. No critical vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were detected in the analyzed content. To improve, the organization should publish security policies, implement cookie consent mechanisms, and consider adding security headers to harden the site further.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy compliance.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Deploy additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
.UK.NET
Description
.UK.NET offers a flexible, restriction-free domain space targeting businesses and individuals seeking UK market presence with global reach. It operates independently and is unaffiliated with UK government or .UK/.NET registries.
Key services
Domain registration for .UK.NET domains, Domain search and availability checking, Abuse handling and support via Gen.xyz
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, Underscore.js, Bootstrap Grid, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive information about .UK.NET domain registration services.
  2. Clear navigation with sections for registration, benefits, live sites, WHOIS, contact, and abuse reporting.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and responsive design.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Contact and abuse reporting handled via Gen.xyz, a known domain services provider.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with jQuery and Underscore.js libraries, and Bootstrap grid for responsive layout. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. The technical implementation is clean with valid meta tags and SEO-friendly content. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for modernization in accessibility and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uk.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uk.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.