Skip to main content

Security report for uic.edu

University of Illinois Chicago · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) is a large public research university located in Chicago, Illinois. It serves over 33,000 students across 16 colleges and includes a hospital and health sciences system. The website reflects its role as a vital educational and cultural institution in the region, targeting students, faculty, researchers, and the public. The business model is centered on higher education and research services, positioning UIC as Chicago's only public research university. The website content is professionally presented, consistent with the university's branding, and provides a clear description of its mission and offerings. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Mouseflow, and Google Tag Manager. It uses HTTPS and loads resources from trusted external domains. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers are not evident, and no public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found. The WHOIS data for the www subdomain was unavailable, but this is likely due to querying the subdomain rather than the root domain. Overall, the domain and website appear legitimate and trustworthy. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to enhance security headers, publish security policies, and provide clear contact channels for security incidents. These improvements would strengthen trust and compliance posture while maintaining the university's reputable online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uic.edu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UIC holds a strong market position as Chicago's sole public research university, serving a large student body and offering diverse academic and health-related services. Its competitive advantage lies in its public status, research capabilities, and integration with health sciences. The business model relies on public funding, tuition, research grants, and healthcare services. Target customers include prospective and current students, faculty, researchers, and healthcare patients. Growth indicators include a broad academic portfolio and regional importance. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers for analytics and consent management. The website's professional presentation supports its authoritative market presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS), lack of published security policies, and no visible incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represent gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency to improve incident readiness and user trust. Compliance with GDPR is partially demonstrated through cookie consent but lacks full policy visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or dedicated security page.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and enhance privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
University of Illinois Chicago
Description
Located in the heart of one of the world’s great cities, the University of Illinois Chicago is a vital part of the educational, technological and cultural fabric of the region. As Chicago’s only public research university with more than 33,000 students, 16 colleges, a hospital and a health sciences system, UIC provides students access to excellence and opportunity.
Key services
higher education, research, health sciences, hospital services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Mouseflow, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo Player API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mouseflow, Siteimprove Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mouseflow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No WHOIS data found for www.uic.edu, likely because WHOIS queries should target uic.edu domain.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with OneTrust technology indicating GDPR compliance efforts.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found in the provided HTML content.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  6. Multiple analytics and tracking scripts are used including Google Analytics and Mouseflow.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and loads external scripts from trusted domains.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts, including Google Analytics, Mouseflow, and Google Tag Manager. It integrates a cookie consent banner powered by OneTrust, reflecting compliance efforts. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip-to-content navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and resource optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uic.edu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uic.edu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.