Skip to main content

Security report for ufg.at

Kunstuniversität Linz · Education · Austria

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kunstuniversität Linz is a medium-sized public university specializing in artistic and industrial design education and research based in Linz, Austria. The website serves students, academic staff, and the public with comprehensive information about degree programs, research projects, events, and institutional details. The university maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern web technologies including Bootstrap and JavaScript libraries. It implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policies, and uses analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar for user insights. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has basic security headers but lacks advanced headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, which slightly impacts the overall security posture. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional digital asset for the university, with recommendations to enhance security headers and publish explicit security policies to improve trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ufg.at

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
72
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Kunstuniversität Linz operates in the education sector, focusing on arts and design disciplines. It targets students, researchers, and cultural communities. The business model is that of a public educational institution offering degree programs, research opportunities, and cultural events. The university holds a strong regional position in Austria with international collaborations and partnerships, as evidenced by linked partner domains. The website supports its academic mission with detailed program information, news, and event calendars. The presence of social media channels and multimedia content indicates active engagement with its audience. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the institution's credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Basic security headers are present, but important headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are missing, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts were found, indicating a gap in formal security communication. Third-party scripts such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar are used, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, which is a potential risk factor. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement advanced security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS data to improve domain trust and legitimacy verification.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kunstuniversität Linz
Description
A university specializing in artistic and industrial design education and research based in Linz, Austria.
Key services
Degree programs in arts and design, Research projects and publications, Cultural exhibitions and events, Student and staff support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery (implied by Bootstrap usage), Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
DataReporter cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained university site with comprehensive content.
  2. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and standard web technologies.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No contact emails explicitly for security or incident response found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, combined with Bootstrap for responsive design. The site uses standard web technologies including CSS and JavaScript, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The site could improve by optimizing loading times and reducing reliance on external scripts. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the university's digital presence effectively with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ufg.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ufg.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.