Skip to main content

Security report for ufcstrike.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UFC Strike operates as an e-commerce platform specializing in the sale of fully licensed UFC video NFTs, targeting UFC fans and NFT collectors. The business appears to be relatively young, founded around 2021, and focuses on a niche market within the digital collectibles space. The website's branding and description emphasize licensed UFC content, positioning it as a specialized provider in the sports NFT market. However, the website content is minimal and currently displays an error message, indicating possible technical or deployment issues that impact user experience and content delivery. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React, Bootstrap, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, and Singular SDK. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, supported by AWS DNS servers. Despite the modern tech stack, the website lacks key security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and limited accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. There is no evidence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor contact information for security or incident response. Extensive user tracking is implemented via multiple analytics and marketing scripts, but privacy compliance is poor due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate, with no privacy protection but stable registration status. Overall, UFC Strike presents a niche digital collectibles business with a modern technical foundation but suffers from poor content availability, lack of privacy and security policies, and minimal user trust signals. Strategic improvements in website content delivery, security hardening, and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance credibility and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ufcstrike.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UFC Strike targets the niche market of UFC fans and NFT collectors by offering fully licensed UFC video NFTs. The business model is e-commerce focused on digital collectibles leveraging blockchain technology. The company is relatively new, founded in 2021, and operates in the technology sector with a focus on sports entertainment and digital assets. The platform integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to drive user engagement and track performance. However, the lack of visible business contact information, privacy policies, and terms of service limits transparency and trustworthiness. The use of a virtual waiting room service suggests anticipation of traffic spikes or demand management. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The company’s market position is niche but could benefit from clearer business information and stronger trust indicators.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and raises privacy concerns. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided, indicating immature security governance. The WHOIS data shows stable domain registration with protections against unauthorized changes but no privacy protection. Overall, the security posture is basic with significant room for improvement in policy transparency, header implementation, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance web security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Improve website content delivery to resolve the current error message and enhance user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Fully Licensed UFC video NFTs.
Key services
Sale of fully licensed UFC video NFTs
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React (implied by chunk.js and runtime-main.js), Bootstrap 5.1.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, Singular SDK, Queue-Fair (virtual waiting room)
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by URL)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with nonce attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment Analytics, Singular SDK, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, Singular SDK
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Singular SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and shows an error message 'Something went wrong.' indicating possible frontend issues or incomplete deployment.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking and analytics scripts are loaded, indicating extensive user tracking.
  5. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses a virtual waiting room service (Queue-Fair) indicating possible traffic management.
  7. No security headers or CSP detected in the provided content.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD) or schema.org markup found.
  9. Website title and meta description indicate focus on UFC licensed video NFTs.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Bootstrap 5.1.0, indicating a modern frontend framework and responsive design foundation. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, and Singular SDK, reflecting a data-driven approach to user engagement. Hosting is inferred to be on AWS due to DNS servers. Performance is moderate but limited by minimal content and an error message displayed on the main page. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with no structured data or schema markup detected. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and security risk. The use of a virtual waiting room service (Queue-Fair) suggests traffic management capabilities but also adds complexity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires improvements in security hardening, content stability, and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ufcstrike.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ufcstrike.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.