Skip to main content

Security report for uf3ceu.es

CEU - Universidad Fernando III · Education · Spain

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Universidad CEU Fernando III (UF3) is a regional higher education institution based in Sevilla, Spain, offering undergraduate, double degree, and master's programs. The website is professionally designed using WordPress, with good SEO and analytics integration, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar. The site implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Cookiebot, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected, which is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data for the domain is inaccessible due to Red.es restrictions, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking visible security headers and vulnerability disclosures. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and targeted at prospective students in the education sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uf3ceu.es

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uf3ceu.es, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
16
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uf3ceu.es.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UF3 positions itself as a medium-sized educational institution focused on the Sevilla region, targeting students seeking university degrees. The business model revolves around academic program offerings and student enrollment. The website content is relevant and consistent with the brand, supported by structured data and official logos. The institution leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and marketing efforts. Absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for operational improvement. No suspicious or unrelated external domains were found, indicating a focused partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management, which are positive security practices. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and requires vigilant maintenance. The absence of WHOIS data due to registry restrictions is noted but not inherently suspicious. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy or security.txt file with incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider enabling WHOIS privacy or providing registrant information consistent with the institution's identity to improve domain trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CEU - Universidad Fernando III
Description
Bienvenido a la Universidad CEU Fernando III. Podrás estudiar Grados, Dobles Grados y Másteres universitarios en Sevilla ▶ ¡Solicita información!
Key services
Grados (Undergraduate degrees), Dobles Grados (Double degrees), Másteres universitarios (University master's degrees)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, MasterSlider, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Rank Math SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based university site with good SEO and analytics integration.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. WHOIS data is inaccessible due to Red.es restrictions, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a child theme and uses popular plugins such as Rank Math SEO, MasterSlider, and Cookiebot. It employs jQuery 3.7.1 and modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for UI components. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar, indicating a mature approach to user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and minified assets. However, no hosting provider information was detected, and no advanced security headers were found. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer business contact data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uf3ceu.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uf3ceu.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.