Skip to main content

Security report for uclarity.com

Exobe AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Exobe AB is a Swedish technology company specializing in digital workspace solutions, IT license management as a Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider, IT security, collaboration platforms, and AI-driven automation. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for organizations seeking to optimize their digital workplace and cloud investments. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations including WP Rocket, lazy loading, and integration with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing for form handling. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security event listeners, and cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the site demonstrates good compliance with privacy regulations and business credibility through certifications and transparent contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uclarity.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Exobe operates in the technology sector focusing on cloud and digital workplace services, leveraging Microsoft partnerships to deliver tailored solutions. Their business model centers on consultancy and cloud license management, targeting medium-sized organizations in Sweden and potentially broader markets. The company maintains a professional online presence with active content updates, blog posts on relevant topics like AI and governance, and a career portal subdomain. Their marketing ecosystem includes Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The absence of a public terms of service or vulnerability disclosure suggests areas for maturity improvement. The company’s trust signals include Microsoft Solution Partner certification and clear contact channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes security best practices such as Content Security Policy monitoring and secure form submissions to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing endpoints. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The security score is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit policies and providing dedicated security contacts. Overall, the security posture is solid for a commercial website but lacks some advanced transparency features.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Exobe AB
Registration number
556769-5605
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Exobe AB
Description
Vi på Exobe hjälper dig och din organisation att identifiera, implementera och optimera lösningar för den digitala arbetsplatsen. Genom nära samarbete med Microsoft kan vi skräddarsy lösningar som ger en skönare arbetsdag, utan att göra avkall på säkerheten.
Key services
IT license management (CSP), IT security solutions, Digital collaboration platforms, AI and automation solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, jQuery, GSAP, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing Forms
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security policy violation event listener
  • Form data submitted securely to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing API
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is primarily in Swedish with English alternate
  3. Strong focus on Microsoft cloud solutions and digital workplace
  4. Multiple forms integrated with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WP Rocket for caching and performance, and GSAP for animations. It uses jQuery and integrates with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing for form data capture. The site is optimized for mobile with responsive design and lazy loading of images. Performance is fast with preloading and deferred script loading. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider details were found in the content. The technical implementation reflects a mature and well-maintained infrastructure suitable for a professional technology consultancy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uclarity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uclarity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.