Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention uaruhr.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for uaruhr.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Universitätsallianz Ruhr · Education · Germany
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
The Universitätsallianz Ruhr (UA Ruhr) website represents a cooperative alliance of three major universities in the Ruhr region of Germany: Ruhr-Universität Bochum, TU Dortmund, and Universität Duisburg-Essen. Established in 2007, the alliance focuses on joint research, study programs, and knowledge transfer. The website serves as an information hub for students, researchers, and partners, showcasing news, events, and collaborative initiatives. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support (German and English), reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system favored by academic institutions. It employs modern frontend libraries such as jQuery, Photoswipe, and Select2, and integrates Matomo for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous script loading, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No privacy or cookie policies were detected in the provided content, which may impact GDPR compliance. The domain registration aligns well with the academic institutions involved, enhancing trustworthiness. No signs of malicious activity or content blocking mechanisms were found. Overall, UA Ruhr's website is a credible, well-maintained academic portal with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. However, improvements in privacy compliance and security policy transparency are recommended to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention uaruhr.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for uaruhr.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with uaruhr.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uaruhr.de.