Skip to main content

Security report for twoday.fi

twoday · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

twoday.fi is the official website of twoday, a large Finnish technology consulting company specializing in digital transformation, data and AI solutions, business applications, and software development. The company serves Finnish enterprises and public sector clients, positioning itself as a leading Nordic technology partner with a strong workforce of 3000 experts. The website is built on HubSpot CMS, hosted behind Cloudflare, and employs modern web technologies and security best practices. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured, with minor recommendations for enhancement. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supported by a consent mechanism. The site features rich content including client case studies, blog posts, and news updates, reflecting a mature digital presence. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and security awareness, making it a trustworthy platform for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching twoday.fi

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

twoday operates as a full-service technology partner focusing on digital transformation for Finnish companies and public sector organizations. Their business model centers on B2B consulting and software services, leveraging cloud technologies and AI to optimize client operations. The company has a strong market position in the Nordic region, supported by a large expert workforce and strategic acquisitions such as Kaito Insight. Their client base includes prominent Finnish public institutions and enterprises across sectors like energy, infrastructure, and government. The website's content strategy emphasizes thought leadership, client success stories, and continuous engagement through blogs and events. Partnerships with international twoday sites indicate a broader Nordic footprint. The company’s focus on people and culture highlights a strong internal value proposition, supporting sustainable growth and innovation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with TLS 1.3 and 1.2 protocols, OCSP stapling, and a set of security headers including HSTS (though not fully enabled with preload), Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. No known SSL vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed, FREAK, or Logjam are detected. Cookies are set with HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite=None attributes, enhancing session security. DNS records show SPF and DMARC policies configured to protect email integrity and reduce phishing risks. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be a future improvement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available on the site. Overall, the security posture is strong with room for minor improvements in transport security and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable full HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement certificate transparency compliance to improve SSL trustworthiness.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Splide.js for carousels, and Swiper.js for sliders. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, ensuring good availability and security. Performance metrics are moderate, with no explicit load time or page size data available. The site is mobile optimized with responsive layouts and accessibility features like skip links and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter cards. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature digital environment suitable for enterprise-level operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with twoday.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review twoday.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.