Skip to main content

Security report for twoday.com

twoday · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

twoday is a large Nordic IT services company specializing in software development, data & AI solutions, consulting, and digital transformation services for public and private sector clients. The company holds a strong market position as a Nordic leader in AI and data engineering, reinforced by strategic acquisitions such as Kaito Insight and major contracts with government agencies. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and cloud hosting via Cloudflare. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities, though improvements in HSTS and transparency compliance are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, twoday demonstrates a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence suitable for its B2B audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching twoday.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

twoday operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital transformation through data, AI, software engineering, cloud platforms, and business applications. Their business model targets enterprises and public sector organizations seeking to modernize IT infrastructure and leverage data-driven insights. The company shows growth through acquisitions and strategic partnerships, such as with Snowflake Elite Partner Kaito Insight. Their marketing and analytics ecosystem includes HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The presence of multiple country-specific domains suggests a regional expansion strategy across Nordic countries. Trust indicators include certifications, customer case studies, and a comprehensive privacy framework.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with valid TLS 1.2 and 1.3 protocols, OCSP stapling, and security headers including HSTS (though not fully enabled with preload), Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and X-XSS-Protection. No known SSL vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed, FREAK, or Logjam are present. Cookies are set with Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite=None attributes. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policy pages, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to strengthen HTTPS enforcement across all subdomains.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Improve certificate transparency compliance to enhance trust and detect certificate mis-issuance.
  5. Add explicit contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses for security and abuse reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, using Bootstrap for responsive design and popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, Splide.js, and Lottie Player for animations. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN, providing performance and security benefits. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance metrics indicate fast loading times and efficient resource management. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a professional and scalable digital presence. Opportunities exist to enhance security transparency and formalize compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with twoday.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review twoday.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.