Skip to main content

Security report for twiceme.com

Twiceme Technology AB · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Twiceme Technology AB is a Swedish company specializing in smart safety technology designed to protect risk takers in sports, construction, and rescue operations. Their flagship offering, the Help the Helpers (HTH) Technology platform, integrates safety features into protective equipment and provides a safety management portal and mobile app to enhance prevention and recovery before and after incidents. The company collaborates with well-known brands such as Oakley, Julbo, and Mammut, positioning itself as an innovator and digital safety standard provider in its market segment. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, and HubSpot for marketing and analytics. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies supported by a consent management system. The use of HTTPS and security-conscious third-party integrations reflects a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs consent-based tracking mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional presentation and partner endorsements. Overall, Twiceme Technology AB demonstrates a strong business and technical foundation with a focus on safety innovation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security and incident response policies, and providing direct company contact information to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching twiceme.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Twiceme Technology AB operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, focusing on safety solutions for sports, construction, and rescue industries. Their business model combines B2B partnerships with equipment manufacturers and B2C engagement through mobile applications and safety portals. The company benefits from a growing ecosystem of partner brands, which enhances market credibility and reach. Growth indicators include a rapidly expanding end-user community and a broad portfolio of integrated products. The company emphasizes innovation, user empowerment, and community safety, positioning itself competitively in a niche but critical market segment.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, consent-based tracking, and no visible vulnerabilities. However, the lack of security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response plans indicate areas for improvement. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The company does not currently provide a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by formalizing security governance and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to communicate the company's approach to security and provide clear contact channels for reporting issues.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security concerns.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential security risks and ensure compliance with evolving privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Twiceme Technology AB
Description
Twiceme is a smart safety technology that protects risk takers before and after an incident using smart safety technology integrated into protective equipment.
Key services
HTH Technology platform, Safety management portal, Integrated safety equipment, Mobile app for safety features, Training platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, HubSpot Analytics and Forms, Wistia video player, Finsweet CMS Slider, Flowbase Social Share
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Segment with consent management
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Segment Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Segment
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on safety technology for sports, construction, and rescue sectors.
  3. Multiple partner brands and testimonials enhance credibility.
  4. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies present.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with consent management.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  7. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies and third-party services for analytics, marketing, and video content. Performance is optimized with CDN delivery and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack includes Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, HubSpot, Cookiebot for consent management, and Wistia for video hosting. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize security-related documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with twiceme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review twiceme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.