Skip to main content

Security report for tweethunter.io

lempire · Technology · France

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tweet Hunter is a specialized SaaS platform offering AI-powered tools to help individuals and brands grow and monetize their audience on X (formerly Twitter). The platform provides a comprehensive suite of services including content creation, scheduling, automation, CRM, and analytics, targeting users ranging from beginners to established influencers. The website is professionally designed with rich content and strong branding consistency, supported by extensive marketing and analytics integrations. Technically, the site is built on Webflow and leverages modern marketing and analytics tools, but suffers from critical security shortcomings due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement. Privacy compliance is addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent management, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the business appears legitimate and well-positioned in the technology sector, but the security posture requires urgent improvement to protect users and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tweethunter.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tweethunter.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
88
Employees
0
Customers
88
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tweethunter.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company 'lempire' operates Tweet Hunter as a subscription-based SaaS targeting X users seeking audience growth and monetization. The business model includes tiered pricing with free trials and refund policies, appealing to a broad range of users from novices to professionals. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its all-in-one approach combining AI content generation, scheduling, automation, CRM, and analytics tailored specifically for X. The marketing ecosystem is mature, utilizing multiple tracking and retargeting tools, and the website content is rich with testimonials and educational resources. The domain registration and hosting details align well with the business claims, indicating operational consistency and legitimacy.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. The lack of HSTS and modern TLS protocols further weakens transport security. While SPF and DMARC records are present, the DMARC policy is set to 'none', offering minimal email protection. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, limiting transparency and preparedness. The use of reputable DNS and hosting providers like Cloudflare is a positive factor, but the critical SSL/TLS issues significantly reduce overall security maturity. Immediate remediation is necessary to safeguard user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload.
  3. Implement a stricter DMARC policy (quarantine or reject) to improve email security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or legal section.
  5. Add a security.txt file and establish a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  6. Review and optimize cookie consent mechanisms to ensure full GDPR compliance and transparency.
  7. Consider adding explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for better user trust.
  8. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users.
  9. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with a modern frontend stack including jQuery and various third-party integrations for analytics, marketing, and customer support. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing robust infrastructure. However, the site suffers from slow load times (approx. 18.7 seconds) and a large page size (~1.6 MB) with many resources (289), indicating potential optimization opportunities. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS support is a critical technical risk. The site uses multiple analytics and tracking services, reflecting a mature digital marketing approach but also raising privacy considerations. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tweethunter.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tweethunter.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.