Skip to main content

Security report for tw-elements.com

TW Elements · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TW Elements is a technology-focused website offering a large collection of free and commercial Tailwind CSS UI components, templates, and plugins. The site targets web developers and designers who use Tailwind CSS, providing resources to accelerate frontend development with customizable and themeable components. The business model includes free open source offerings alongside a commercial pro version. Technically, the site is built using the Hugo static site generator and leverages modern frontend technologies including Tailwind CSS and JavaScript libraries. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with a reputable registrar and domain status protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published privacy or security policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and safe for general audiences, but could enhance privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tw-elements.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TW Elements occupies a niche in the frontend development ecosystem by providing Tailwind CSS components and design blocks. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive free collection with optional commercial upgrades, appealing to both hobbyists and professional developers. The target customers are frontend developers seeking ready-made UI elements to speed up development. The partnership with mdbootstrap.com suggests a broader ecosystem and potential cross-promotion. The recent domain registration aligns with a new or evolving product offering. Revenue streams likely include commercial licenses and premium support. Growth indicators include active GitHub presence and community engagement via discussions. Strategic observations include the need to formalize privacy and security policies to build trust and comply with regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes protective status flags. However, the absence of DNSSEC, Content-Security-Policy headers, and published privacy or security policies indicates gaps in security best practices. The use of multiple tracking and analytics scripts without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add Content-Security-Policy and other security headers to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information and security incident response details to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TW Elements
Description
A free collection of open source UI components, templates, sections & plugins for Tailwind CSS. Features dark mode and theming customization options.
Key services
Free Tailwind CSS UI components, Templates, Sections, Plugins, Commercial Pro version
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Hugo static site generator, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Clipboard.js
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security status domain flags clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited in WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a technical resource for Tailwind CSS UI components
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Site uses modern analytics and tracking tools without visible consent mechanism
  5. Domain is recently registered and consistent with business claims
  6. No security headers beyond HTTPS detected
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern static site generator (Hugo) with Tailwind CSS for styling, ensuring fast performance and responsive design. It uses popular analytics and tracking tools, indicating a mature approach to user behavior analysis. The site is hosted with OVH sas, a reputable provider. The HTML structure is well-formed with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter Cards). However, the lack of advanced security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible at a basic level but could improve accessibility features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a good user experience but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tw-elements.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tw-elements.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.