Skip to main content

Security report for turiba.lv

Biznesa augstskola Turība · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biznesa augstskola Turība is a recognized higher education institution in Latvia offering nationally and internationally accredited business study programs in Latvian and English. The website targets prospective and current students, providing access to class schedules, online registration, and student portals. The institution positions itself as a reputable business school with a clear focus on quality education. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and consent technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for GDPR compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with CSRF tokens and cookie consent mechanisms, though HTTP security headers and incident response contacts could be improved. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing explicit incident response contacts to strengthen security and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching turiba.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education sector, focusing on business studies with a medium-sized institutional footprint in Latvia. Its business model revolves around delivering accredited academic programs and supporting students through digital services like online registration and class schedules. The website's integration with multiple advertising and tracking platforms suggests active marketing and outreach efforts. The presence of subdomains dedicated to class schedules and student portals indicates a well-developed digital ecosystem supporting its operations. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms. The institution maintains a good reputation with consistent branding and trust signals such as privacy policies and cookie consent. Growth potential is supported by digital engagement and compliance with GDPR, positioning the institution well in the regional education market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens are implemented, which are positive indicators. The use of Cookiebot for cookie consent and integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are managed with user consent, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security.txt file and incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an educational institution but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and improving incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biznesa augstskola Turība
Description
Valsts un starptautiski akreditētas studiju programmas latviešu un angļu valodā.
Key services
Accredited study programs in Latvian and English, Online registration, Class schedules, Student portal access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Adform tracking, Facebook Pixel, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Adform, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implemented.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no suspicious indicators found.
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising services with consent.
  6. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found.
  7. Good technical implementation with modern tracking and consent tools.
  8. Content is relevant to education sector and professionally presented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, integrating third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Adform, and Cookiebot. The presence of CSRF tokens indicates attention to security in form submissions. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts for tracking and advertising. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 62/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with turiba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review turiba.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.