Skip to main content

Security report for tul.cz

Technická univerzita v Liberci · Education · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Technická univerzita v Liberci is a medium-sized educational institution in the Czech Republic offering diverse study programs including technical, social sciences, arts, and architecture. The university emphasizes practical application in research and personalized student care, positioning itself as a regional leader in applied research and education. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive information for prospective and current students. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, maintaining good performance and accessibility standards. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration trust but the official branding and contact details strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and serves its educational mission effectively.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tul.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tul.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The university targets students, researchers, and academic professionals, offering a broad portfolio of study programs and research initiatives. Its business model revolves around education and applied research services, supported by student accommodation and continuing education. The institution maintains a strong presence on social media and uses digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract from the university's established market position. Partnerships and subsidiary domains like tuni.tul.cz and shop.tul.cz indicate an ecosystem supporting student engagement and services. The university's focus on practical research and personalized education provides competitive advantages in the regional education sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management compliant with GDPR, indicating a mature privacy approach. Tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used responsibly with user consent. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could improve transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and technical header improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and CMS components to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration data to improve domain trustworthiness and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Technická univerzita v Liberci
Description
Technická univerzita v Liberci is a university offering a broad range of study programs including technical, social sciences, arts, and architecture. It emphasizes practical application in research and education, with a focus on applied research and student individual care.
Key services
Study programs, Research and development, Student accommodation and services, Continuing education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Easy Fancybox, Complianz GDPR plugin, MetaSlider
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a university domain.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with official university email and phone.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) with common plugins.
  6. Presence of multiple social media links and official university branding.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.7.2 with jQuery 3.7.1 and several plugins including Complianz GDPR for cookie management, Easy Fancybox for media display, and MetaSlider for image sliders. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the university's digital presence effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tul.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tul.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.