Skip to main content

Security report for tsg.je

Total Solutions Group (TSG) Jersey · Technology · Jersey

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Total Solutions Group (TSG) Jersey is a leading information management and technology services provider based in Jersey, serving clients across the Channel Islands, UK, Gibraltar, Mauritius, and South Africa. The company offers a broad range of services including document management, scanner hardware support, robotic process automation, GDPR consultancy, and information security. Their market position is strong regionally, supported by partnerships with recognized technology providers such as Kofax and Mitratech. The website reflects a professional business model focused on B2B services with clear contact channels and trust indicators such as Cyber Essentials certification. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins like WPBakery Page Builder and LayerSlider. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. However, some technical improvements are recommended, including the implementation of security headers and proper configuration of analytics tools. The website's performance is moderate with basic SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and no visible sensitive data exposure. The presence of Cyber Essentials certification indicates a commitment to security standards. However, the absence of security headers and lack of an incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is partially met with privacy and cookie policies present, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism reduces compliance confidence. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-positioned in its market niche. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, configuring analytics properly, and publishing explicit security and incident response policies to strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  5. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsg.je

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
72
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TSG operates in the technology sector focusing on information management solutions tailored for businesses in Jersey and surrounding regions. Their competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive service offering that combines hardware, software, and consultancy, supported by strategic partnerships with industry leaders like Kofax and Mitratech. The business model is B2B with revenue streams from hardware sales, managed services, and consultancy. The target customers are enterprises and organizations requiring document and data management solutions, governance, and security compliance. Growth indicators include a diverse geographic client base and recognition through certifications. The partnership ecosystem enhances solution offerings and market reach. Operationally, TSG maintains a professional digital presence with clear branding and contact accessibility.

Security posture

TSG's security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no evident exposure of sensitive data. The Cyber Essentials certification is a positive indicator of baseline security controls. However, the website lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a published security policy or incident response plan reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Forms use Contact Form 7 with AJAX, which is standard but requires regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Properly configure or remove unused Google Analytics plugins to avoid unnecessary data collection and potential privacy issues.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Total Solutions Group (TSG) Jersey
Description
Jersey’s leading Information Management business supporting clients across the Channel Islands, UK, Gibraltar, Mauritius, and South Africa. Focus on maximising operational efficiency, productivity, and de-risking information and data exposure.
Key services
Scanner hardware supply, support & maintenance, Centralised Document Policy Management, Kofax imaging capture solutions, Document Management solutions, Dedicated scan bureau, Project Management / Business Analyst consultancy, Workflow & Robotic Process Automation (RPA), Governance & GDPR consultancy, Information Security consultancy, Records Management Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Open Sans), Contact Form 7, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Contact Form 7 with AJAX
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional business site for an information management company based in Jersey.
  2. Content is comprehensive about services and partners.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in multiple locations.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured.
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite cookie policy page.
  9. Cyber Essentials certification displayed, indicating security awareness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform utilizing popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and LayerSlider for content management and presentation. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend enhancements. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but could be improved with structured data and enhanced accessibility features. The presence of unused or unconfigured analytics plugins suggests some technical debt. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but would benefit from modernization efforts focused on security headers, analytics configuration, and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsg.je. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsg.je.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.