Skip to main content

Security report for tsfmizzou.com

University of Missouri Tiger Scholarship Fund · Education · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the University of Missouri Tiger Scholarship Fund's Memorial Stadium Improvements Project, serving as a fundraising and informational splash page. It targets university supporters and athletics fans, providing project renderings, press releases, and donation forms. The site is built on the Sidearm Sports platform and hosted on AWS infrastructure, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and comScore. The technical implementation is solid with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is basic with a linked privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though no terms of service or security policies are present. The WHOIS data shows an anomalous future creation date, likely a data error, but the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and uses AWS DNS. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its fundraising purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsfmizzou.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The University of Missouri Tiger Scholarship Fund operates as a non-profit entity focused on collegiate athletics fundraising, specifically for stadium improvements. Its market position is niche within university athletics fundraising, leveraging official university branding and partnerships with Sidearm Sports and the university athletics department. The business model centers on donor engagement and project promotion through digital channels. The website integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to track user engagement and optimize fundraising efforts. The partnership ecosystem includes Sidearm Sports as the platform provider and the official university athletics domains. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of donation forms. Strategic observations suggest maintaining strong university affiliation and enhancing transparency with additional policy pages could improve donor trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections against unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit incident response contacts or security policies, which limits readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is indicated via the privacy policy and cookie consent, but no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial fundraising site but could be improved with enhanced DNS security and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear data retention policies and terms of service.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
University of Missouri Tiger Scholarship Fund
Description
Memorial Stadium Improvements Project for University of Missouri athletics fundraising and improvements.
Key services
Fundraising for stadium improvements, Providing project information and renderings, Donor engagement via forms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, RequireJS, Knockout.js, Underscore.js, Slick Carousel, LazySizes, Sidearm Sports platform, AWS DNS, Cloudfront CDN
Frameworks
Sidearm Sports, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
AWS, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, comScore, Krux
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager (DFP)
Tracking pixels
comScore, Krux (Oracle Data Cloud), ScorecardResearch
Marketing tools
Krux
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official university athletics fundraising splash page.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. Uses multiple Google and third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the splash page.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are linked and present on a related domain.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No explicit incident response or security contact information found.
  9. Domain WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation date, likely data error.
  10. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Sidearm Sports CMS, jQuery, RequireJS, Knockout.js, and various analytics and marketing scripts. It is hosted on AWS infrastructure with Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes are implemented, supporting inclusive user experience. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, fonts, and tracking, which is common but requires ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. The WHOIS data anomaly suggests a need for domain registration verification. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsfmizzou.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsfmizzou.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.