Skip to main content

Security report for trustradius.com

TrustRadius · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TrustRadius operates as a technology and business research firm specializing in providing verified B2B software reviews and comparisons. The company targets technology buyers and software users seeking in-depth, trustworthy feedback to inform purchasing decisions. Their platform leverages a proprietary algorithm and human verification to ensure review authenticity, positioning them as a reputable player in the B2B software review market. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and employs modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Monitoring and analytics are implemented via New Relic, and privacy compliance is supported through OneTrust cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable gap, warranting further verification. Overall, TrustRadius presents a credible and professional online presence with room for improvement in transparency around security and domain registration.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of trustradius.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trustradius.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention trustradius.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,235
Employees
5
Customers
3,216
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-01-10 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for trustradius.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –auth.trustradius.com2026-01-10
  • –admin.trustradius.com2025-11-12
  • –trustradius.com2025-11-05
  • –auth.trustradius.com2025-08-29
  • –www.trustradius.com2025-08-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TrustRadius's market positioning as a verified software review platform gives it a competitive advantage in the B2B technology sector. Their business model centers on aggregating and validating user reviews to provide reliable insights for software buyers. The company likely generates revenue through partnerships, advertising, or lead generation tied to software vendors. Their target customers include enterprise and medium-sized businesses evaluating software solutions. The presence of social media channels and structured data markup enhances their digital footprint and SEO. No parent company or subsidiaries were identified, suggesting independent operation. The company is medium-sized and based in the United States, focusing on technology sector clients. Strategic partnerships or integrations were not explicitly found in the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes key security headers such as Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, reflecting adherence to web security best practices. The use of New Relic for monitoring and OneTrust for cookie consent indicates attention to performance and privacy compliance. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact information, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may impact trust from security-conscious users. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is strong but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrustRadius
Description
TrustRadius is a technology and business research firm based in Austin, Texas. The company is known as a review platform for verified B2B technology and software reviews through a proprietary algorithm and human verification.
Key services
Software reviews, Software comparisons, Verified user feedback
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, New Relic monitoring, OneTrust cookie consent
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and metadata
  2. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent
  4. No explicit security or incident response pages found
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. Social media presence is consistent with business branding
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and optimized performance. It integrates New Relic for application monitoring and performance analytics, and OneTrust for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website metadata, improving SEO and rich search results. Performance appears fast with preloading of key assets and deferred script loading. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable web presence with opportunities for further modernization and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 −3Low20 findingsView report
  2. 84/100 +6Low19 findingsView report
  3. 78/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trustradius.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trustradius.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.