Skip to main content

Security report for triona.se

Triona AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Triona AB is a Swedish IT company specializing in innovative IT solutions focused on logistics, infrastructure, and transport sectors. The company positions itself as a leading and reliable supplier combining domain expertise with specialized software products and expert consulting services. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant business content. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various JavaScript libraries, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in security transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching triona.se

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Triona operates primarily in the Nordic region with localized domains for Sweden, Finland, Norway, and an English site. Their business model focuses on B2B IT solutions for infrastructure and transport industries, offering both products and expert consulting. The company maintains active investor relations and publishes news updates, indicating a mature and transparent business. Their partnership ecosystem includes regional domains and integrations with marketing and analytics tools. The company targets a broad audience within their sectors, emphasizing reliability and innovation. Growth indicators include recent news and product launches. The website content and structure support their market positioning as a specialized technology provider.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent compliance. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, and no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present. Forms do not show anti-CSRF tokens, which could be a risk. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Inzynk tags introduces tracking but is managed with user consent. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a corporate site but could be enhanced with better header policies, explicit incident response channels, and vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a security.txt file and a clear vulnerability disclosure policy with contact information.
  3. Enhance form security by adding anti-CSRF tokens and input validation.
  4. Provide explicit GDPR compliance statements and update privacy policy to reflect data retention and user rights.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and minimize tracking to improve privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Triona AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Triona AB
Description
Triona är en ledande och pålitlig leverantör av innovativa IT-lösningar med anknytning till logistik- och infrastrukturrelaterad verksamhet. De kombinerar verksamhetskunnande inom infrastruktur, transporter och skogsindustri med branschinriktade produkter och expertkompetens inom systemutveckling och systemförvaltning.
Key services
IT solutions for logistics and infrastructure, Expert consultants, Software products such as Triona C-Load, C7 Projects, FleetControl, SINUS, TRACS Flow, TNE, TRE
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap, Flexslider, Owl Carousel, DataTables, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by og:url https://triona.se/
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/deny buttons
  • No exposed emails in HTML (only contact forms and address)
  • Google Analytics loaded asynchronously
  • External scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Inzynk
Marketing tools
Inzynk tags
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Multiple language flags indicate regional presence in Nordic countries.
  3. Strong focus on IT solutions for logistics, infrastructure, and transport sectors.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with clear user options.
  5. No visible email addresses to reduce spam; contact via forms and physical address.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  7. No explicit terms of service found.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure.
  9. No explicit data protection officer contact found.
  10. Good presence of investor relations and news updates indicating active business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery 2.2.4, Flexslider, Owl Carousel, and DataTables for UI components and interactivity. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts and icons from Font Awesome. Analytics is implemented via Google Tag Manager and Inzynk tags. The site appears moderately performant with asynchronous script loading and a structured navigation system. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include outdated jQuery version and lack of advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with triona.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review triona.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.