Skip to main content

Security report for tribecrm.es

efficy · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tribe CRM, operated under the parent company efficy, offers a highly adaptable CRM platform designed to help businesses grow by integrating sales, marketing, and customer service functions with AI capabilities. The website targets Spanish-speaking businesses seeking customizable CRM solutions with seamless integrations and workflow automation. The company positions itself as a modern, customer-centric CRM provider with a growing client base exceeding 10,000 users. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Piwik PRO, and Cookiebot for consent management. However, the site suffers from a lack of valid SSL/TLS certificates, resulting in insecure HTTP connections and no HTTPS enforcement, which is a critical security concern. Performance is suboptimal with slow load times and a large page size, though mobile optimization and content quality are strong. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no DMARC record, exposing the site to potential risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism in place. Business credibility is supported by clear contact information, professional content, and trust signals such as testimonials and partner links. Overall, while the business and content aspects are strong, the security deficiencies significantly impact the risk profile. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and security headers is recommended to protect user data and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tribecrm.es

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tribe CRM operates in the technology sector, focusing on CRM software with AI enhancements and workflow automation. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering tiered subscription plans billed annually. The company targets medium-sized businesses in Spain and other European markets, providing multi-language support. The presence of over 10,000 customers indicates a solid market position. Partnerships with analytics and marketing service providers like Piwik PRO, CrazyEgg, and SalesLoft enhance its ecosystem. The company leverages integrations and API capabilities to extend functionality, appealing to businesses seeking customizable CRM solutions. The parent company efficy supports the brand, adding corporate stability. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and possibly professional services. The website content and structure reflect a mature marketing approach with clear calls to action, demos, and free trials to drive customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No security headers such as HSTS, CSP, or X-Frame-Options are implemented, increasing the risk of clickjacking, XSS, and other web attacks. The DNS configuration lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, reducing DNS security. Email security is partially addressed with a valid SPF record but no DMARC policy, leaving email spoofing risks. Cookie consent is managed properly with Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are found on the website, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools increases the attack surface and requires careful management of data sharing and privacy. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in transport security and HTTP security headers to meet modern security standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Configure DMARC along with SPF and DKIM to improve email authentication and reduce phishing risks.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and add CAA records to enhance DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  5. Conduct a security audit of third-party integrations and ensure data sharing complies with privacy policies.
  6. Improve website performance by optimizing resources and reducing page size to enhance user experience.
  7. Add explicit security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  8. Maintain regular updates of CMS, plugins, and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  9. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user inclusivity.
  10. Continue to maintain comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with transparent consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8 with the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and Select2 libraries for UI enhancements. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Piwik PRO, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, and CrazyEgg, integrated through asynchronous scripts to minimize blocking. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie declarations. Hosting appears to be managed by divinet.nl with DNS and MX records pointing to related infrastructure. The site suffers from slow load times (13.2 seconds) and a large page size (~511 KB) with 178 resources, indicating potential for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Security-wise, the absence of valid SSL/TLS and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical debt. No security headers or DNS security extensions are configured. The technical stack is modern but requires urgent security hardening and performance tuning to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tribecrm.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tribecrm.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.