Skip to main content

Security report for tribecrm.dk

efficy · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tribe CRM, operated by efficy, is a modern, AI-enhanced CRM platform designed to support businesses in sales, marketing, customer service, and project management. The platform targets medium-sized businesses seeking flexible and integrated CRM solutions with advanced automation and AI capabilities. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive content and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with several marketing and analytics integrations, including Piwik PRO, Google Analytics, and VWO, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate is a critical security flaw that undermines user trust and data protection. The site implements GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with a robust consent mechanism, reflecting good privacy practices. Overall, while the business and content aspects are strong, the security posture requires urgent improvement to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tribecrm.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a flexible and comprehensive CRM provider with over 10,000 customers, emphasizing AI and workflow automation as key differentiators. The SaaS business model with tiered pricing and free trials supports customer acquisition and retention. The partnership with efficy and integration capabilities enhance market reach and product ecosystem. The website's clear navigation, testimonials, and localized support indicate a customer-centric approach. The extensive use of analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven growth strategy. The domain registration and WHOIS data align with the company's recent establishment and business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in unencrypted HTTP traffic, which is a major security risk. No HSTS policy or DNSSEC is implemented, reducing protection against common web attacks. The SPF record is configured, but DMARC is missing, which may expose the domain to email spoofing risks. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts, increasing the attack surface and requiring careful management of user consent and data privacy. Cookie consent is well implemented via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. No explicit security or incident response policies are found on the site, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is low and requires immediate remediation.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  4. Add a DMARC record to improve email authentication and reduce phishing risks.
  5. Review and minimize third-party scripts to reduce attack surface and improve performance.
  6. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust.
  7. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  8. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for all users.
  9. Maintain domain protection locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8 with Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery, Select2, and integrates with Piwik PRO analytics, VWO for A/B testing, and Cookiebot for consent management. The DNS is managed by divinet.nl with no DNSSEC enabled. The site has a large page size (~477 KB) and slow load time (~8.45 seconds), indicating potential optimization needs. The SSL certificate is missing or invalid, and no modern TLS protocols are supported. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, marketing, and social media integrations. The technical stack is modern but requires security hardening and performance tuning to improve reliability and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tribecrm.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tribecrm.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.