Skip to main content

Security report for transip.nl

TransIP · Technology · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TransIP is a leading Dutch hosting provider and the largest domain registrar in the Netherlands, serving over 150,000 customers. Their core business revolves around domain registration, web hosting, VPS, and colocation services, targeting both individuals and businesses seeking reliable internet infrastructure solutions. The website is professionally designed, well-branded, and optimized for the Dutch market with clear navigation and relevant content. Technically, the site employs modern web standards, uses reputable third-party services such as HubSpot for marketing and Iubenda for cookie compliance, and enforces HTTPS with strong security headers, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is strong with no detected vulnerabilities or suspicious content, and privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, reinforcing legitimacy and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing dedicated security and incident response pages, implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and enhancing accessibility features to meet broader compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transip.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TransIP holds a strong market position as the largest domain registrar in the Netherlands, leveraging a service-oriented business model focused on internet infrastructure products. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive customer base, expert helpdesk, and comprehensive service offerings including domain registration, VPS, and colocation. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription-based hosting and domain services. The target customer segments include small to large businesses and individual entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. The company appears to maintain a consistent branding strategy and a professional online presence. Partnerships with marketing and compliance service providers like HubSpot and Iubenda indicate a mature operational ecosystem. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. Growth indicators include a large customer base and a broad service portfolio. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident management communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, and implementation of cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information limits transparency and may impact user trust in security matters. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for responsible vulnerability management. The use of reputable third-party services is a positive indicator but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good, but improvements in policy disclosure and incident readiness communication are recommended to elevate the security culture and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with recognized standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TransIP B.V.
Registration number
34285387
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TransIP
Description
Internet voor elk idee ✓ Hosting provider ✓ Grootste registrar van Nederland! ✓ Hosting vanaf € 1,00 p/m ✓ Meer dan 150.000 klanten ✓ Deskundige helpdesk.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, Virtual Private Servers (VPS), Colocation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, HubSpot CTA, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Dutch and targets the Netherlands market.
  3. Strong focus on domain registration and hosting services.
  4. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of reputable third-party services like HubSpot and Iubenda.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integrations of HubSpot for marketing automation and Iubenda for cookie compliance. The hosting appears to be managed by TransIP itself, indicating control over infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and structured data. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for continuous monitoring of third-party scripts and potential improvements in accessibility compliance. The site’s technical debt appears low, and modernization opportunities include enhanced security transparency and incident management capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transip.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transip.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.