Traceable AI · Technology · United States
Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.
Traceable AI is a leading enterprise SaaS provider specializing in intelligent application and API security tailored for the AI era. Their platform offers comprehensive discovery, risk assessment, security testing, and runtime protection for applications and APIs, with a strong focus on protecting generative AI APIs and mitigating bot and fraud threats. Positioned as a leader in the SecureIQLab 2025 Cloud WAAP CyberRisk Validation Report, Traceable serves large enterprises and technology-driven organizations, leveraging advanced analytics and threat hunting capabilities to secure complex API ecosystems. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Marketo for marketing automation, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and tracking tools. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with secure HTTPS connections and bot protection mechanisms such as Cloudflare Turnstile captcha. The use of professional marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure supporting customer engagement and data-driven insights. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling. However, explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy or incident response page are not present, representing areas for improvement. The absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of privacy-compliant cookie consent mechanisms reflect a strong privacy posture aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, Traceable AI presents a trustworthy and professional online presence consistent with its enterprise security focus. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for SaaS companies, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
DKIM selector 'google' uses 344-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention traceable.ai, from OffSeq Breach.
2 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for traceable.ai.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with traceable.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review traceable.ai.