Skip to main content

Security report for tomatom.cz

Tom Atom s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tom Atom s.r.o. is a Czech-based technology service provider specializing in creating intuitive and effective websites, internet marketing, mobile applications, programming, and graphic design. The company targets businesses seeking professional digital solutions to enhance their online presence and sales. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references, positioning itself as a niche player in the Czech market. Technically, the website uses a moderately modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA integration, and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate and professional business. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and security, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and business credibility transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tomatom.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
100
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tom Atom operates as a small-sized technology service company focused on web development and digital marketing services for businesses in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around service delivery with key revenue streams likely from custom website projects, marketing campaigns, mobile app development, and programming solutions. The company leverages a portfolio of references to build trust and attract clients. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled lead capture via contact forms. The company does not publicly display certifications or security policies, which could be an area for growth to enhance trust. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators are limited but the professional presentation and use of analytics tools indicate a data-driven approach to business operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented on the contact form to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent is managed with granular user control, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit privacy, security, or incident response policies reduces transparency and may present compliance gaps. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site uses some older JavaScript libraries which may pose potential vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be strengthened with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide direct company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tom Atom s.r.o.
Description
Tom Atom creates intuitive and effective websites that help sell products and services, attract new customers, and build a good reputation for businesses.
Key services
Tvorba webových stránek, Internetový marketing, Mobilní aplikace, Programování chytrých řešení, Grafické práce
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Hotjar, CookieConsent v2.7.2, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed options.
  4. Contact information is only available via a modal contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Website uses modern but somewhat dated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap 3.3.7).
  7. Security best practices are partially implemented but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links or company emails explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 2.2.4, which are stable but somewhat dated technologies. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for analytics, marketing, and security purposes. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with external resources loaded from reputable CDNs. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. The site uses a cookie consent banner with detailed user controls, indicating attention to privacy regulations. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tomatom.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tomatom.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.