Skip to main content

Security report for tmapserver.cz

T-MAPY spol. s r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

T-MAPY spol. s r.o. is a Czech company specializing in geoinformation technologies and solutions primarily serving public administration, emergency services, transportation, and commercial sectors. With over two decades of market presence, the company offers a range of GIS applications, digital technical mapping, facility management, asset management, crime analytics, and smart city solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting municipalities, government bodies, and commercial clients. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, though some performance and security header improvements are possible. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CAPTCHA usage, but lacks some advanced headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust from a domain registration perspective but does not detract from the company's evident legitimacy and market position. Overall, the website is well-designed, content-rich, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tmapserver.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position in the Czech geoinformation technology market, serving a broad client base including municipalities, regions, state organizations, and commercial enterprises. Their business model focuses on providing tailored GIS and facility management solutions, supported by a portfolio of specialized applications like Digital Technical Map and TESS electronic record management. The firm demonstrates growth and stability with a large number of completed projects and satisfied customers. Their multilingual web presence and social media engagement indicate an intent to serve both local and international markets. The absence of detailed financial or parent company data suggests an independent medium-sized enterprise with a focus on technology and government sectors.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Ensure all WordPress plugins and themes are kept up to date to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS data or use verified domain registration to enhance domain legitimacy and trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
T-MAPY spol. s r.o.
VAT number
CZ47451084
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
T-MAPY spol. s r.o.
Description
T-MAPY - Jsme tým odborníků v oblasti informačních technologií a geoinformačních systémů. Rozumíme Vám i Vašim požadavkům a umíme Vás posunout dál.
Key services
GIS applications for municipalities, regions, and state administration, Digital Technical Map (DTM) services, Facility management application (GeoFaM), Asset management applications (Pasporty), Analytical crime map, Electronic record management system (TESS), SmartCity solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome 5.15.4, Bootstrap 3.3.7 (commented but referenced), jQuery (commented but referenced), Fresh Framework plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Google Tag Manager integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or registry restrictions
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in main HTML content
  4. Multiple external trusted domains linked, including social media and government entities
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No security headers detected in provided data, opportunity for improvement
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in main HTML content
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube confirmed via JSON-LD
  9. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO and other plugins such as Fresh Framework and MonsterInsights (though the latter is not fully configured). It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, and FontAwesome for icons. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some CSS and JS minification and caching evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tmapserver.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tmapserver.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.