Skip to main content

Security report for tjn.lv

Rīgas Tehniskās jaunrades nams "Annas 2" · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Tehniskās jaunrades nams "Annas 2" is a Latvian educational institution dedicated to fostering technical creativity and innovation among youth in Riga. The organization provides workshops, courses, and events aimed at developing technical skills and supporting young innovators. The website reflects a medium-sized educational entity with a clear focus on youth and technical education. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, leveraging modern web fonts and standard web technologies. While the site is accessible and well-structured, it lacks advanced security headers and detailed WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security best practices. The website is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tjn.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution occupies a niche in the education sector focused on technical creativity for youth, positioning itself as a local leader in Riga. Its business model is non-profit and educational, targeting students, educators, and technical enthusiasts. The website content and structure support its mission with relevant services such as workshops and youth programs. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its educational nature. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence and provides clear contact information, enhancing credibility. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy but the website content supports a trustworthy profile.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found in the provided HTML. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts that could introduce privacy concerns. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing additional security controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and more detailed business information to strengthen business credibility and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Tehniskās jaunrades nams "Annas 2"
Description
Rīgas Tehniskās jaunrades nams "Annas 2" is an educational and creative institution focused on technical creativity and youth development in Riga, Latvia. It offers various workshops, courses, and events to foster innovation and technical skills among young people.
Key services
Technical creativity workshops, Educational courses, Youth development programs, Events and exhibitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, PHP, JavaScript, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Google Fonts.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism.
  5. Contact information including email, phone, address, and contact form is available.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  9. Content is educational and safe for general audiences.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS and theme combination. It uses Google Fonts for typography and standard JavaScript for interactivity. The site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a good design quality. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or rich snippets detected. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for an educational institution but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tjn.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tjn.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.