Skip to main content

Security report for titanhq.com

TitanHQ · Technology · Ireland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TitanHQ is a professional cybersecurity SaaS provider specializing in layered security solutions including email protection, DNS filtering, anti-phishing, anti-malware, email archiving, and security awareness training. The company targets businesses, managed service providers, SMBs, and specific industries such as education, financial services, and hospitality. Following a merger with Redstor, TitanHQ is part of the new entity CyberSentriq, expanding its cybersecurity offerings. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, Drift chat, and cookie consent management, indicating a focus on user engagement and compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust slightly but the overall business credibility remains high due to consistent branding and contact information. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching titanhq.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TitanHQ holds a solid market position as a cybersecurity vendor offering multiple specialized products and bundled plans. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting MSPs and various industry verticals. The merger with Redstor to form CyberSentriq suggests growth and expansion. The company maintains multiple physical offices and contact points across Ireland, the US, the UK/EU, and APAC, supporting a medium-sized enterprise footprint. The website content is professional and comprehensive, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. The presence of product ratings and social media links further supports market credibility. The company leverages modern marketing and analytics tools to optimize user experience and conversion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but may be due to privacy protection or recent registration. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adding explicit security governance documentation and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and standards.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TitanHQ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TitanHQ
Description
TitanHQ best-in-class SaaS cybersecurity platform delivering a layered security solution for email protection and DNS security.
Key services
Email protection, Anti-phishing, Anti-malware, DNS filtering, Email archiving, Security awareness training, Phishing simulation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Drift chat, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), CookiePro consent management, Picturefill polyfill
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer, Drift
Marketing tools
Drift chat, Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong presence of layered cybersecurity products and solutions
  3. Multiple contact methods and physical addresses provided
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented with GDPR compliance
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  6. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible recent registration or privacy protection
  7. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Drift for live chat, and Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing. CookiePro manages cookie consent, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. The technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from explicit CMS or platform identification and continuous performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with titanhq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review titanhq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.