Skip to main content

Security report for tingo.ai

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tingo.ai is a technology startup launched in 2023, specializing in personalized AI companionship services, primarily focused on creating customizable AI girlfriends. The platform offers users the ability to design virtual companions with tailored appearances and personalities, leveraging advanced AI technologies. Positioned in a niche market, Tingo targets individuals seeking virtual relationships and roleplay experiences. The business model appears to be subscription-based with premium features. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like SvelteKit, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent and privacy policy present but lacks detailed GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tingo.ai

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tingo.ai operates in the emerging AI companionship sector, offering unique value through customizable AI girlfriends and chatbots. Its competitive advantage lies in personalization and roleplay features. Revenue likely derives from premium subscriptions and in-app purchases. The target audience is adult users interested in virtual relationships and AI-driven interactions. The company uses privacy protection for domain registration, common for startups in sensitive niches. Partnerships with marketing and analytics providers support growth and user engagement. The business is small and relatively new, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. Strategic focus should include enhancing trust through clearer contact and security policies.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and standard security headers, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security culture and user trust. Overall, security posture is moderate but improvable.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file for transparency.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing GDPR adherence and data retention policies.
  5. Provide clear company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Welcome to Tingo, the premier destination for personalized AI companionship. Here, you can craft your perfect AI girlfriend by customizing her appearance, personality, and more.
Key services
AI girlfriend creation, Personalized AI chat companions, Image generation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Taboola, Customer.io
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Taboola
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Customer.io
Marketing tools
Customer.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers AI girlfriend creation and personalized AI chat services.
  2. Content is rich with character profiles and interactive features.
  3. No explicit company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. Domain uses privacy protection and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  8. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the SvelteKit framework, indicating a modern and performant frontend architecture. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Taboola, which enable extensive user tracking and advertising capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom-built solution. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tingo.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tingo.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.