Skip to main content

Security report for timeacle.com

timeacle GmbH & Co. KG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

timeacle GmbH & Co. KG operates a professional SaaS platform specializing in digital appointment booking and call-up systems, targeting sectors such as healthcare, banking, and public services. The company offers a modular system with a full version and enterprise modules, emphasizing customer convenience through mobile notifications and queue management. The website reflects a mature business with a domain age since 2012 and consistent branding. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Vue.js and Vuetify, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and GDPR compliance, though formal security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching timeacle.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

timeacle positions itself as a niche SaaS provider in the appointment and queue management market, leveraging modular licensing and add-ons to cater to diverse customer needs. The business model focuses on transparency with a free trial and no automatic billing post-trial, enhancing customer trust. The company targets institutional clients such as hospitals and banks, indicating a B2B focus. The presence of multiple modules like IVR and customer journey tools suggests a strategy to upsell and expand service offerings. The lack of visible phone contact or physical address on the main site may indicate a primarily digital engagement model. The company maintains GDPR compliance and transparent data handling, which is critical for its European customer base.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR compliance. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for mature security postures. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header configurations. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and YouTube iframe API introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and implementing additional security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and advertise a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding more direct contact options such as phone numbers or physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
timeacle GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Streamline appointment booking and queue management with timeacle. Simplify processes for hospitals, banks, services, and authorities. Issue and manage tickets, send mobile notifications, and let customers choose how to spend their waiting time. Efficient, digitalized, and customer-friendly solutions!
Key services
Appointment booking system, Call-up system, Queue management, Mobile notifications, Ticket issuing stations, Operator and admin access, Additional modules like IVR, customer journey, process automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Vuetify, Pinia, Axios, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Vue.js, Vuetify
Platforms
SaaS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Strong focus on GDPR compliance and user privacy
  3. Comprehensive product and service descriptions with clear calls to action
  4. Use of modern frontend technologies and responsive design
  5. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found on the homepage or footer
  6. Contact primarily via email support@timeacle.com
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No visible social media links
  9. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with clear user options
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack with Vue.js and Vuetify, ensuring a responsive and accessible user interface. The use of Pinia for state management and Axios for HTTP requests indicates a well-structured frontend architecture. Performance appears moderate with module preloading and asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is addressed with language attributes and responsive design. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain is stable and well-registered. There is no CMS detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and well-executed with opportunities for performance optimization and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with timeacle.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review timeacle.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.