Skip to main content

Security report for tiltify.dev

Tiltify · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is a Cloudflare Access login portal for Tiltify.dev, a platform focused on fundraising and donation management. The page serves as an authentication gateway using Azure Active Directory OAuth2 integration, ensuring secure access for authorized users. Due to the nature of the page, no public content or business information is directly accessible without authentication. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare's security services and Microsoft Azure's identity platform, indicating a modern and secure approach to user authentication. However, the lack of publicly available privacy policies, cookie notices, or contact information limits the assessment of compliance and user transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong for authentication, but the site is inaccessible for content analysis, resulting in a low overall AI score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tiltify.dev

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tiltify operates in the fundraising technology sector, providing a platform for users to manage donation campaigns. The use of Cloudflare Access and Azure AD suggests a focus on enterprise-grade security and identity management. The business model likely revolves around SaaS offerings for nonprofits and fundraisers. The absence of public-facing content on this page limits insights into revenue streams or partnerships. The platform targets users requiring secure access to fundraising tools, positioning itself as a niche player in the fundraising technology market.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare Access for secure authentication and integrates with Azure AD OAuth2, demonstrating a mature security infrastructure. HTTPS is enforced, and no vulnerable scripts or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security headers and public security policies reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The site effectively blocks unauthorized access, but the lack of public compliance documentation is a gap.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies accessible without authentication.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide public contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance SEO metadata and structured data for better indexing and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare Access login portal requiring authentication, blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Tiltify
Description
Tiltify is a platform related to fundraising and donations, providing services for users to sign in and manage their accounts. The page is specifically a login portal for Tiltify.dev via Cloudflare Access.
Key services
User authentication, Fundraising campaign management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Access, Microsoft Azure AD OAuth2, JavaScript polyfills
Platforms
Cloudflare
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare Access for authentication
  • OAuth2 integration with Azure AD
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Cloudflare Access login page for Tiltify.dev
  2. No public content available without authentication
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service links visible
  4. No contact information or security policies provided
  5. Uses Azure AD for authentication
  6. No WHOIS data for subdomain, expected behavior
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  8. Page is mobile responsive and uses modern JavaScript polyfills
Technical notes

Notes

The site is hosted on Cloudflare and uses Cloudflare Access for authentication, integrating with Microsoft Azure AD for OAuth2 login. The HTML is modern and mobile responsive, with JavaScript polyfills ensuring compatibility. No CMS or analytics tools are detected on this login page. Performance is moderate, typical for a secure login portal. The technical setup prioritizes security and access control but lacks public-facing content or metadata for SEO and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tiltify.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tiltify.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.