Skip to main content

Security report for tigerlilytraining.co.uk

Tigerlily Training Ltd · Education · United Kingdom

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tigerlily Training Ltd is a well-established UK-based provider of specialist first aid training courses for individuals and businesses. Founded in 2010, the company offers a wide range of accredited courses including First Aid at Work, Paediatric First Aid, Mental Health First Aid, Fire Marshal training, and Food Hygiene. Their business model focuses on delivering training both at their venues across the UK and in-house at client workplaces, targeting a broad audience from individuals to corporate clients. The website demonstrates a strong market position supported by extensive customer reviews and active social media engagement. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Knockout.js, and various UI libraries for a responsive and interactive user experience. It integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and LiveChat, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes several security best practices such as secure forms and no exposed sensitive data. However, some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Contact information is transparent and professional, enhancing business credibility. Overall, Tigerlily Training Ltd presents a trustworthy, professional, and secure online presence with a comprehensive offering in the education sector. The website quality, business credibility, and security posture are strong, with minor recommendations for security header enhancements and ongoing third-party script audits to maintain security integrity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

      Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

      What to do: Consider restricting access to RPC or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: NetBIOS

      Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing

      What to do: Consider restricting access to NetBIOS or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tigerlilytraining.co.uk

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tigerlily Training Ltd operates in the education sector specializing in first aid training across the UK. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad portfolio of accredited courses, flexible delivery modes (in-person, blended, virtual), and strong customer satisfaction evidenced by over 21,000 reviews with a 4.9 rating. The business targets individuals, small teams, schools, and corporate clients, leveraging partnerships and social media to expand reach. Revenue streams likely include course fees, group bookings, and in-house training contracts. The company demonstrates growth potential through free webinars and trainer recruitment initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and review aggregators, supporting brand trust and market visibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of reputable third-party services for analytics and live chat is balanced with the need for continuous monitoring of these scripts for vulnerabilities. The absence of some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement to mitigate risks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be enhanced to demonstrate security readiness. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting good data protection practices. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional header implementations and formal incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party JavaScript libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Consider publishing incident response contact channels and security policies to build further trust with users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tigerlily Training Ltd
Description
Tigerlily Training provide specialist first aid training courses for businesses and individuals across the UK including First Aid at Work, childcare, early years, schools and colleges.
Key services
First Aid at Work courses, Paediatric First Aid, Fire Marshal training, Mental Health First Aid, Food Hygiene training, Group bookings and in-house training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Knockout.js, Moment.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, LiveChat, MightySlider, Owl Carousel, Splide Carousel
Frameworks
Knockout.js MVVM
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure third-party scripts
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
LiveChat, Demandbase
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong presence of first aid training courses with detailed offerings.
  3. Multiple user login portals for learners, clients, and trainers.
  4. Active social media integration and customer reviews.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Clear contact information and policies available.
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or proprietary CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Knockout.js, and various UI plugins for sliders and carousels. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and LiveChat, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing approach. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Ionos SE, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt may exist due to reliance on older jQuery versions and multiple third-party scripts, which require ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance. The site structure is clear and user-friendly, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tigerlilytraining.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tigerlilytraining.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.