Skip to main content

Security report for tickettailor.com

Ticket Tailor · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ticket Tailor is a well-established online ticketing platform that simplifies the process of selling tickets for events of all sizes. The company targets event organizers ranging from individuals hosting small events to medium-sized businesses, offering a user-friendly platform with integrated payment processing and event management features. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism with excellent design quality, clear navigation, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, supported by integrations with Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and Cookiebot for analytics, marketing, and consent management. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, ensuring a smooth user experience across devices. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The security posture is strong, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed through detailed policies and a robust cookie consent mechanism, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits direct verification of domain ownership, though the overall trust indicators and third-party integrations support legitimacy. Overall, Ticket Tailor presents a secure, compliant, and professional online service with a strong market position in the event ticketing industry. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and enhancing direct contact information for security concerns to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tickettailor.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tickettailor.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,963
Employees
0
Customers
2,909
Third parties
54
Weak passwords
12%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tickettailor.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ticket Tailor operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on online ticketing and event management services. The company’s business model revolves around providing a platform for event organizers to sell tickets online, generating revenue likely through service fees or subscriptions. The platform’s ease of use and integration with major payment processors like PayPal position it competitively in the market. The presence of extensive marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. Partnerships with major advertising platforms such as Meta and Google enhance its marketing reach. The company targets a broad customer base including individuals and small to medium enterprises, with growth potential in expanding event types and geographic reach. The absence of detailed company registration data suggests privacy protection, common in tech startups and SaaS businesses.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive set of security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The use of Cookiebot for consent management and Intercom for customer support indicates attention to privacy and secure communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response plan and lack of a vulnerability disclosure program represent areas for improvement. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified but limits transparency. Overall, the site aligns well with GDPR compliance and best practices, but could enhance trust by publishing more explicit security documentation and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear and verified contact information specifically for security and abuse reporting.
  4. Maintain and regularly update cookie and privacy policies to reflect evolving regulations.
  5. Enhance transparency around company registration and ownership where possible to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ticket Tailor
Description
The world's most loved ticketing platform. Whether it’s your first event ever, or your biggest event yet, we make it simple to sell tickets online.
Key services
Online ticket sales, Event management, Payment processing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, YouTube Player API, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Tracking
Marketing tools
Intercom, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  5. Multiple reputable third-party integrations for analytics, marketing, and support
  6. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast performance. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Amplitude), marketing (Meta, TikTok), and customer support (Intercom). The site uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Performance appears optimized with preloading of fonts and scripts, asynchronous loading of external scripts, and responsive design. Accessibility features are present, including ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. The lack of CMS detection suggests a custom or headless CMS approach, possibly Prismic as indicated by cookie providers. Hosting provider details are not explicit but Cloudflare or similar CDN usage is not detected as a WAF. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports scalability and security, with opportunities to improve documentation and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tickettailor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tickettailor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.