Skip to main content

Security report for tiberiumalliances.com

Electronic Arts · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Electronic Arts (EA) operates the official website for Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances, a multiplayer online game. The site serves as a digital platform to engage gamers and fans of the Command & Conquer franchise, providing game information and community resources. EA is a leading global interactive entertainment company with a strong market position and a broad portfolio of games. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, consent management tools, and analytics integration. The site is well-branded and professionally designed, targeting a gaming audience with clear content and navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response information are not evident. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to query restrictions or privacy, but the domain's legitimacy is supported by strong branding and technical indicators. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tiberiumalliances.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EA's website for Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances positions the company as a major player in the online gaming sector. The business model focuses on digital distribution and multiplayer engagement, leveraging EA's brand strength. The site integrates multiple third-party services for analytics and consent management, indicating a mature marketing and compliance approach. The absence of explicit contact or privacy policy pages in the provided content suggests potential areas for enhanced user trust and regulatory compliance. The presence of official branding and structured data supports SEO and brand consistency. EA's global reach and enterprise scale are evident, though specific regional or subsidiary details are not disclosed on this page.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates consent management for cookies, reflecting adherence to basic security and privacy standards. Use of Google Tag Manager and New Relic indicates active monitoring and analytics. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options in the HTML content suggests opportunities to strengthen defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may impact user confidence. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy accessible from the website.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Electronic Arts
Description
Live the world of Command and Conquer Tiberium Alliances!
Key services
Online multiplayer game, Game content distribution, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, New Relic, TrustArc Consent Management, Web Components, Masonry.js, SoundCloud Player API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Google Optimize, TrustArc Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the game.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  3. No contact or privacy policy pages explicitly found in provided content.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration analysis.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with integrations including Google Tag Manager, New Relic for performance monitoring, and TrustArc for consent management. Web components and libraries like Masonry.js and SoundCloud API are used for UI and media features. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and deferred resources. Hosting details are not explicit but likely managed by EA's infrastructure. Technical debt appears low with current technologies, though improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tiberiumalliances.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tiberiumalliances.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.