Skip to main content

Security report for thrustmaster.com

Thrustmaster · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thrustmaster is a well-established company specializing in the design and manufacture of gaming hardware and accessories for PC and consoles, serving gamers ranging from amateurs to experts. The company has a strong market presence with a professional website that reflects its brand and product offerings effectively. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and some security best practices observed, though there is room for improvement in implementing comprehensive security headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the lack of WHOIS domain registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, which should be further investigated to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, supporting the company's credibility in the gaming hardware market.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of thrustmaster.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thrustmaster.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Thrustmaster operates in the technology sector, focusing on gaming peripherals such as wheels, joysticks, and gamepads. The business model centers on manufacturing and retail, targeting a broad gamer demographic. The company benefits from a consistent brand image and trust signals such as official social media presence and structured data markup. The website supports marketing and analytics efforts through tools like Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, enabling data-driven decision-making. Despite the missing WHOIS data, the company's digital footprint and content quality suggest a stable market position with potential for growth and partnership expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of security plugins to prevent user enumeration is a positive indicator. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests opportunities to harden defenses against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to increase transparency and trust.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to strengthen domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Thrustmaster Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Thrustmaster
Description
Designer and manufacturer of hardware and accessories for PC and game consoles since 1990. For amateur, intermediate and expert gamers.
Key services
Design and manufacture of gaming wheels, Joysticks, Gamepads, Accessories for PC and consoles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Select2 4.1.0-rc.0, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin to prevent user enumeration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Select2 for UI enhancements. SEO is supported by the Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are managed via Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. The site shows good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Some technical debt is evident in the lack of full security headers and limited accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the presence of CDN and external libraries suggests a distributed infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security through updated configurations and enhanced compliance with web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thrustmaster.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thrustmaster.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.