Skip to main content

Security report for threespot.com

Threespot · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Threespot is a well-established interactive agency specializing in creative strategy, design, and digital platform development primarily serving non-profit and socially impactful organizations. The company emphasizes meaningful change and has been operating since 1999, with a strong market position supported by its Certified B Corp status. Their website showcases a professional design, detailed case studies, and a commitment to social causes, targeting clients who want to make a difference rather than just profit. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and branding strongly suggest a legitimate business. Security posture is good with HTTPS and secure form handling, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching threespot.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention threespot.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for threespot.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Threespot operates in the technology and non-profit sectors, providing digital agency services including narrative strategy, research, creative design, and platform development. Their business model is service-based, focusing on clients with social impact missions. The company leverages its Certified B Corp certification as a trust and differentiation factor. The website content and case studies indicate a medium-sized agency with a strong reputation and a clear target audience of non-profits and socially conscious organizations. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not currently undermine the company's market presence. The firm uses popular marketing tools like Mailchimp and Google Analytics, indicating active engagement with digital marketing and audience insights. Social media presence on major platforms supports brand visibility and client engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce trust concerns.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve inclusivity for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Threespot
Description
We are Threespot, an interactive agency founded on the belief that creative strategy and strategic creative can bring about meaningful change.
Key services
Narrative strategy, Research, Campaigns, Visual identities, Creative design, Platform development, App design, CMS development, Content strategy, Audience research
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery 3.7.1, Webpack
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital agency focused on social impact and non-profit clients
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an established business domain
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  4. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Has a newsletter signup form using Mailchimp with reCAPTCHA protection
  6. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage or footer
  9. Physical address provided in footer
  10. Certified B Corp status prominently displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA v3. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and employs Webpack for JavaScript bundling. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and responsive design. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation and semantic HTML. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information detected. The site could benefit from performance optimizations such as caching and security header enhancements. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with threespot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review threespot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.