Skip to main content

Security report for threesixty.com

Atom · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atom.com operates a comprehensive online marketplace specializing in premium domain name sales, branding contests, and related services such as trademark filing and audience research. The website for ThreeSixty.com serves as a landing page for a high-value domain sale, offering multiple purchase options including buy now, installments, and escrow services. The platform targets businesses and entrepreneurs seeking brandable domain names and branding solutions, positioning itself as a trusted and established player in the domain marketplace industry since 2011. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and monitoring tools such as New Relic and Intercom, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. While the site is mobile-optimized and features good navigation and content quality, it suffers from critical security shortcomings including the absence of a valid SSL certificate and missing security headers, which significantly impact its security posture. From a security perspective, the lack of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks and undermines trust. However, the presence of a purchase protection program, verified domain badges, and clear contact information contribute positively to business credibility. The domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, while the business model and content quality are strong, immediate remediation of security issues is essential to enhance user trust and compliance. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, security headers, and privacy mechanisms will elevate the platform's security and privacy compliance, supporting its market position and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching threesixty.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atom.com holds a strong market position as a premium domain marketplace with a broad portfolio of curated domains and branding services. Its business model combines direct domain sales with value-added services such as naming contests and AI-powered branding tools, generating diversified revenue streams. The platform targets startups, SMBs, and enterprises seeking memorable brand identities. Partnerships with escrow services and affiliate programs enhance transactional security and marketing reach. Growth indicators include extensive domain listings, buyer interest signals, and integration of AI tools. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with trust signals like Trustpilot ratings and purchase protection, supporting customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of essential security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Content-Type-Options. These gaps expose the site to risks including data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No evidence of incident response policies or security certifications was found. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated via privacy policy presence but lacks explicit mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. The site uses modern monitoring tools but does not fully leverage security best practices. Immediate SSL deployment and header configuration are critical to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to enhance DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish a security incident response policy and contact channels for abuse reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atom
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack with extensive use of New Relic for performance and error monitoring, Intercom for customer engagement, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure with IP 52.20.84.62. The site uses Bootstrap CSS classes for responsive design and loads multiple fonts and images optimized for performance. However, the page load time is relatively slow (~8 seconds) with a large page size (~380 KB) and many resources (61). Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is moderate with proper meta tags and structured data. Technical debt is indicated by missing SSL and security headers, which pose operational risks. Opportunities exist to optimize resource loading and enhance security configurations to improve overall technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with threesixty.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review threesixty.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.